finck6 Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Regardless I bet we all could agree that the set could certainly be a little more fresh. And fresh does not mean playing its so easy fourth instead of third.fresh compared to when? 2001? it's very fresh compared to then.fresh compared 2 the here and now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay410 Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Regardless I bet we all could agree that the set could certainly be a little more fresh. And fresh does not mean playing its so easy fourth instead of third.fresh compared to when? 2001? it's very fresh compared to then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay410 Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 why did you refuse to answer the question?Because I have no obligation to reply to every question you ask Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finck6 Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 why did you refuse to answer the question?why does mister saint laurent the "chinese democracy" guy love the care bears? LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GnRDuff1 Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Regardless I bet we all could agree that the set could certainly be a little more fresh. And fresh does not mean playing its so easy fourth instead of third.fresh compared to when? 2001? it's very fresh compared to then.For me it would mean compares to the 2011 North American tour. I don't care if they do or not, I'll go either way. But if they did, that would be my definition of "freshening up" the setlist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finck6 Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Regardless I bet we all could agree that the set could certainly be a little more fresh. And fresh does not mean playing its so easy fourth instead of third.fresh compared to when? 2001? it's very fresh compared to then.For me it would mean compares to the 2011 North American tour. I don't care if they do or not, I'll go either way. But if they did, that would be my definition of "freshening up" the setlistwhether it's 2011 or 2013.....the setlist needs 2 CHANGE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GNR123GNR456 Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Regardless I bet we all could agree that the set could certainly be a little more fresh. And fresh does not mean playing its so easy fourth instead of third.fresh compared to when? 2001? it's very fresh compared to then.For me it would mean compares to the 2011 North American tour. I don't care if they do or not, I'll go either way. But if they did, that would be my definition of "freshening up" the setlistwhether it's 2011 or 2013.....the setlist needs 2 CHANGE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finck6 Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Regardless I bet we all could agree that the set could certainly be a little more fresh. And fresh does not mean playing its so easy fourth instead of third.fresh compared to when? 2001? it's very fresh compared to then.For me it would mean compares to the 2011 North American tour. I don't care if they do or not, I'll go either way. But if they did, that would be my definition of "freshening up" the setlistwhether it's 2011 or 2013.....the setlist needs 2 CHANGE more like double thumbs up 2 my point. fans want change. and the beat goes on at guns n roses concerts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts