Jump to content

Foreign Language/World Cinema


Snake-Pit

Recommended Posts

The Society of the spectacle is easily one of the top 3 movies ever made. I'll probably open a thread about Guy Debord's films in the forthcoming months.

"On the Society of the Spectacle (Original Announcement for the Film)"

Until now it has generally been assumed that film is a completely unsuitable medium for presenting revolutionary theory. This view was mistaken. The lack of any serious attempts in this direction stemmed simply from the historical lack of a modern revolutionary theory during virtually the entire period of the cinema’s development; as well as from the fact that the potentials of cinematic composition, despite so many declarations of intent on the part of filmmakers and so much feigned satisfaction on the part of a miserable public, have as yet scarcely been liberated.

Published in 1967, The Society of the Spectacle is a book whose theoretical insights have profoundly influenced the new current of social critique that is now more and more openly undermining the established world order. Its present cinematic adaptation, like the book itself, does not offer a few partial political critiques, but a total critique of the existing world; that is, a critique of all aspects of modern capitalism and of its general system of illusions.

The cinema is itself an integral part of this world, serving as one of the instruments of the separate representation that opposes and dominates the actual proletarianized society. As revolutionary critique engages in battle on the very terrain of the cinematic spectacle, it must thus turn the language of that medium against itself and give itself a form that is itself revolutionary.

The text and images of this film form a coherent whole; but the images are never mere direct illustrations of the text, much less demonstrations of it (cinematic “demonstrations” are in any case never reliable due to the unlimited possibilities of manipulation offered by the unilateral editing of the material). Instead, the film’s use of images (whether photographs, newsclips, or sequences from preexisting films) is governed by the principle of détournement, which the situationists have defined as “communication that includes a critique of itself.” The images through which spectacular society presents itself to itself are taken and turned against it: the spectacle’s means should be treated with insolence. As a result, in a certain sense this film, coming at the end of the cinema’s pseudo-autonomous history, incorporates all the memories of that history. It can thus be seen simultaneously as a historical film, a Western, a love story, a war movie, etc. Like the society it examines, it also presents a number of comical aspects. In talking about the spectacular order, and about the commodity domination that it serves, one is also talking about what this order hides: class struggles and strivings toward real historical life, revolution and its past failures, and the responsibilities for those failures. Nothing in this film is made to please the fashionable blockheads of leftist cinema: it has equal contempt for what they respect and for the style in which they express that respect. One who is capable of understanding and denouncing an entire socio-economic formation will denounce it even in a film. Objections to our “extremism” are meaningless, because current history is already on the verge of going beyond the most extreme possibilities imagined.

Theses that have never before been presented in the cinema will now appear there in a never before seen form, simply because for the first time a filmmaker has undertaken an uncompromising critique.

In the socio-economic context, the total freedom required to create such a film obviously means that the producer must renounce any claim to exert any preliminary control over the director, whether by insisting that he present a synopsis or by seeking to obtain from him any other sort of meaningless commitment. This has been recognized in the contract between the filmmaker and the producer, Simar Films: “It is understood that the filmmaker will carry out his work in complete freedom, without any control or supervision whatsoever, and without even being obliged to pay the slightest attention to any comment that the producer might make regarding any aspect of the content or of the cinematic form that the filmmaker feels appropriate for his film.”

Considering that this film itself expresses its meaning in a sufficiently comprehensible manner, the producer and the filmmaker believe that it is unnecessary to provide any further explanations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In The Mood For Love - directed by Wong Kar Wai. In Chinese

A Bout de Soufle (aka Breathless) - with Jean Seberg. In French

Belle de Jour - with Catherine Deneuve. In French

Spoorloos (aka The Vanishing). In Dutch (don't confuse this for the American remake which is lame in comparison to the original)

Mon Oncle - with Jacques Tati (the man was a genius). In French

Any film directed by Pedro Almodovar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch some French films people! They make extraordinary films about interesting subjects and filmed in the most beautiful way. I'm rarely disappointed by French film and can actually sit and watch the whole way through. I find a lot of films to be very poorly scripted and/or directed, but the French ones tend to stand out the most to me.

I suppose if you like action, then Chinese cinema is pretty cool, but I'm not into that (hence my preference for Wong Kar Wai films when it comes to Chinese cinema). Most Chinese films are very 1 dimensional in my view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Len B'stard

NOW LISTEN UP...CUZ I'LL ON SAY ONCE...WE ARE NOT SICK MEN! *struts out of the thread like a badman* :lol:

Watch some French films people!

Check out Les Enfants Du Paradis if you like French cinema :)

Edited by sugaraylen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NOW LISTEN UP...CUZ I'LL ON SAY ONCE...WE ARE NOT SICK MEN! *struts out of the thread like a badman* :lol:

Watch some French films people!

Check out Les Enfants Du Paradis if you like French cinema :)

The three hours and 15 minutes duration has put me off before. I really don't have that kind of attention span any more. Get too distracted and turn it off after a while and have to do something superfluous before watching again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of French cinema, for the past few months I've been subjected to this poster almost everyday in the Underground. That's the most punchable face in history. One cannot look so douchey without being French.



Just fucking look at him! I would pay good money to perform the head stomp from Drive on his face based on that picture alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...