Jump to content

ISIS Eyeing Mexican Border Entry Into the U.S. (Confirmed False By Captain America).


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

They think Iraq they homeland? Fundamentalists are like the egomaniacal rock stars of politics only its not only blue m&ms they want. Whether they are right is way outweighed by how crazy they are. Applying reason to the situation is suicidal.

Edited by wasted
  • Like 1
Posted

Many of THEM are Iraqis. We didn't invade Iraq? Sure about that? :lol:

So if some terrorist Asian origination invades Vietnam, you would still blame that on the U.S., huh?

:lol:

I'm not even gonna bother with that.

Posted

i think they should kill these guys with fire. the only deterrent to blowing this shit off he map is the consequences to the environment. otherwise - fuck this shit.

Posted

Many of THEM are Iraqis. We didn't invade Iraq? Sure about that? :lol:

So if some terrorist Asian origination invades Vietnam, you would still blame that on the U.S., huh?

:lol:

I'm not even gonna bother with that.

But what if most of them were Vietnamese?

The ones that eat their propaganda and at the same time, try to expose the West's propaganda, are the only ones being fooled.

Posted (edited)

But what if most of them were Vietnamese?

Then they wouldn't be "invading" now would they? This is retarded to talk about Vietnam.

The ones that eat their propaganda and at the same time, try to expose the West's propaganda, are the only ones being fooled.

wut

Edited by magisme
Posted

But what if most of them were Vietnamese?

Then they wouldn't be "invading" now would they? This is retarded to talk about Vietnam.

The ones that eat their propaganda and at the same time, try to expose the West's propaganda, are the only ones being fooled.

wut

I guess you're right then.

Since some of the terrorists are Iraqi, they have a right to do what they do. Going by your logic, Timothy McVeigh had every right to do what he did.

If you only could realize how prejudice some of your comments are, maybe you would realize how wrong they are?

Posted

But what if most of them were Vietnamese?

Then they wouldn't be "invading" now would they? This is retarded to talk about Vietnam.

The ones that eat their propaganda and at the same time, try to expose the West's propaganda, are the only ones being fooled.

wut

I guess you're right then.

Since some of the terrorists are Iraqi, they have a right to do what they do. Going by your logic, Timothy McVeigh had every right to do what he did.

If you only could realize how prejudice some of your comments are, maybe you would realize how wrong they are?

How could you know whether my comments are prejudiced or wrong when you clearly don't understand them?

Really, KK, fuck off if you think I'm defending those psychos.

Posted

Don't care. :sleeper:

So did the Prozac stop working?

Prozac doesn't have anything to do with being jaded with morons that stand no chance agajnst us in an "invasion" and being sick of an entire clustefuck of an area. As someone not on Prozac, "Don't care."
Posted

Many of THEM are Iraqis. We didn't invade Iraq? Sure about that? :lol:

Please clarify.

Not sure what I'm clarifying.

You said ISIS invaded Iraq. It's more complicated than that since many of them are Iraqis. There's a difference between an invasion and an armed rebellion and a revolution and a criminal syndicate and a bunch of other things, and the difference matters when it comes to international law at the very least. Remember quaint shit like law?

You said we didn't invade Iraq. Uh, yeah we did. A bunch of times. And as much as we like to talk about how we've withdrawn from Iraq, we still have tens of thousands of people there keeping a paternal eye on things.

  • Like 1
Posted

Many of THEM are Iraqis. We didn't invade Iraq? Sure about that? :lol:

Please clarify.

Not sure what I'm clarifying.

You said ISIS invaded Iraq. It's more complicated than that since many of them are Iraqis. There's a difference between an invasion and an armed rebellion and a revolution and a criminal syndicate and a bunch of other things, and the difference matters when it comes to international law at the very least. Remember quaint shit like law?

You said we didn't invade Iraq. Uh, yeah we did. A bunch of times. And as much as we like to talk about how we've withdrawn from Iraq, we still have tens of thousands of people there keeping a paternal eye on things.

No, we don't. Not with guns, anyway.

And like I said, because some of the terrorists are of iraqi descent, that makes it ok? Seriously, dude? Like really? You like to spark off on retarded comments but that thought process is offensive to even the mentally challenged. ISIS is less than 1% of the Iraqi population....like, seriously....wtf.

Posted

Yes, if I were saying that what ISIS is doing is OK, I should be called retarded and offensive. Lucky for me, I never said that once.

Who ever said you said that? You stated that some of ISIS were Iraqi. So it was "complicated"....and you insinuated that the U.S. shouldn't get involved since some of them were Iraqi.

Posted

Yes, if I were saying that what ISIS is doing is OK, I should be called retarded and offensive. Lucky for me, I never said that once.

Who ever said you said that? You stated that some of ISIS were Iraqi. So it was "complicated"....and you insinuated that the U.S. shouldn't get involved since some of them were Iraqi.

And like I said, because some of the terrorists are of iraqi descent, that makes it ok? Seriously, dude? Like really?

You said it.

....

The US shouldn't get involved either way. Iraqis or not. More precisely, the US should stop being involved. That's imo.

Whether they're Iraqis matters in terms of international law. That's not imo. That's just true facts. I know no one wants to talk about that. Bush made sure it became irrelevant and we've all passively accepted.

Posted (edited)

Yes, if I were saying that what ISIS is doing is OK, I should be called retarded and offensive. Lucky for me, I never said that once.

Who ever said you said that? You stated that some of ISIS were Iraqi. So it was "complicated"....and you insinuated that the U.S. shouldn't get involved since some of them were Iraqi.

And like I said, because some of the terrorists are of iraqi descent, that makes it ok? Seriously, dude? Like really?

You said it.

....

The US shouldn't get involved either way. Iraqis or not. More precisely, the US should stop being involved. That's imo.

Whether they're Iraqis matters in terms of international law. That's not imo. That's just true facts. I know no one wants to talk about that. Bush made sure it became irrelevant and we've all passively accepted.

Uhm...no, not really. Once anyone joins an internationally known terrorist organization, they are no longer considered anything but terrorists. ;)

BTW, this was checkmate about 10 posts ago.

Anyway, since Captain America decided to start a thread about ISIS invasion of the U.S. through the Mexican Border, this has been absolutely confirmed as false. So mods, please feel free to delete or lock this thread. It is officially in the Captain America/Ratbrain realm.

P.S., I still luv ya, Mags..... :P

Edited by Kasanova King
Posted

Yes, if I were saying that what ISIS is doing is OK, I should be called retarded and offensive. Lucky for me, I never said that once.

Who ever said you said that? You stated that some of ISIS were Iraqi. So it was "complicated"....and you insinuated that the U.S. shouldn't get involved since some of them were Iraqi.

And like I said, because some of the terrorists are of iraqi descent, that makes it ok? Seriously, dude? Like really?

You said it.

....

The US shouldn't get involved either way. Iraqis or not. More precisely, the US should stop being involved. That's imo.

Whether they're Iraqis matters in terms of international law. That's not imo. That's just true facts. I know no one wants to talk about that. Bush made sure it became irrelevant and we've all passively accepted.

Uhm...no, not really. Once anyone joins an internationally known terrorist organization, they are no longer considered anything but terrorists. ;)

BTW, this was checkmate about 10 posts ago.

Thank you for demonstrating my point perfectly. Although maybe I should change "passively accepted" to "actively promoted."

Posted

Yes, if I were saying that what ISIS is doing is OK, I should be called retarded and offensive. Lucky for me, I never said that once.

Who ever said you said that? You stated that some of ISIS were Iraqi. So it was "complicated"....and you insinuated that the U.S. shouldn't get involved since some of them were Iraqi.

And like I said, because some of the terrorists are of iraqi descent, that makes it ok? Seriously, dude? Like really?

You said it.

....

The US shouldn't get involved either way. Iraqis or not. More precisely, the US should stop being involved. That's imo.

Whether they're Iraqis matters in terms of international law. That's not imo. That's just true facts. I know no one wants to talk about that. Bush made sure it became irrelevant and we've all passively accepted.

Uhm...no, not really. Once anyone joins an internationally known terrorist organization, they are no longer considered anything but terrorists. ;)

BTW, this was checkmate about 10 posts ago.

Thank you for demonstrating my point perfectly. Although maybe I should change "passively accepted" to "actively promoted."

Or promoted actively, socially accepted....accepted passively.....maybe..... :shrugs:

:P

Posted

Now we know none of this is a big danger because why? Because Captain America has started a huge 'Let's Build a Bomb Shelter / Bunker in the Back Yard Because We Are All Gonna Die!!!' thread on it.

  • Like 1
Posted

ISIS can have Texas. It is starting to look like a middle eastern country. Oil rigs and dried up lands thanks to fraking.

Just out of curiosity, haven't the oil rigs been there for over 50 years....as in 50 years before fracking?

Posted

ISIS can have Texas. It is starting to look like a middle eastern country. Oil rigs and dried up lands thanks to fraking.

Just out of curiosity, haven't the oil rigs been there for over 50 years....as in 50 years before fracking?

He's a Yankee.

  • Like 1
Posted

Yeehaw, just got my permit and Ima headin to El Paso to hunt me some hajis.

RG806.gif

ISIS can have Texas. It is starting to look like a middle eastern country. Oil rigs and dried up lands thanks to fraking.

Just out of curiosity, haven't the oil rigs been there for over 50 years....as in 50 years before fracking?

Been fracking in the oil patch since the 40s. Contrary to what most people seem to know, it is a safe process that has been used hundreds of thousands of times without one single instance of a fracked bore hole, or injection well, polluting the water table.

Posted

Whatever happened to Napalm? That orange stuff sprayed out of planes during the Viet Nam invasion. It would set anything on fire that it touched. Why doesn't anyone use that anymore?

It causes diabetes.

I am serious.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...