wasted Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 (edited) They think Iraq they homeland? Fundamentalists are like the egomaniacal rock stars of politics only its not only blue m&ms they want. Whether they are right is way outweighed by how crazy they are. Applying reason to the situation is suicidal. Edited August 30, 2014 by wasted 1 Quote
magisme Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 Many of THEM are Iraqis. We didn't invade Iraq? Sure about that? So if some terrorist Asian origination invades Vietnam, you would still blame that on the U.S., huh? I'm not even gonna bother with that. Quote
Jackie Moon Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 i think they should kill these guys with fire. the only deterrent to blowing this shit off he map is the consequences to the environment. otherwise - fuck this shit. Quote
Ace Nova Posted August 30, 2014 Author Posted August 30, 2014 Many of THEM are Iraqis. We didn't invade Iraq? Sure about that? So if some terrorist Asian origination invades Vietnam, you would still blame that on the U.S., huh? I'm not even gonna bother with that.But what if most of them were Vietnamese? The ones that eat their propaganda and at the same time, try to expose the West's propaganda, are the only ones being fooled. Quote
magisme Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 (edited) But what if most of them were Vietnamese? Then they wouldn't be "invading" now would they? This is retarded to talk about Vietnam.The ones that eat their propaganda and at the same time, try to expose the West's propaganda, are the only ones being fooled.wut Edited August 30, 2014 by magisme Quote
Ace Nova Posted August 30, 2014 Author Posted August 30, 2014 But what if most of them were Vietnamese? Then they wouldn't be "invading" now would they? This is retarded to talk about Vietnam.The ones that eat their propaganda and at the same time, try to expose the West's propaganda, are the only ones being fooled.wutI guess you're right then. Since some of the terrorists are Iraqi, they have a right to do what they do. Going by your logic, Timothy McVeigh had every right to do what he did.If you only could realize how prejudice some of your comments are, maybe you would realize how wrong they are? Quote
magisme Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 But what if most of them were Vietnamese? Then they wouldn't be "invading" now would they? This is retarded to talk about Vietnam.The ones that eat their propaganda and at the same time, try to expose the West's propaganda, are the only ones being fooled.wutI guess you're right then. Since some of the terrorists are Iraqi, they have a right to do what they do. Going by your logic, Timothy McVeigh had every right to do what he did.If you only could realize how prejudice some of your comments are, maybe you would realize how wrong they are?How could you know whether my comments are prejudiced or wrong when you clearly don't understand them?Really, KK, fuck off if you think I'm defending those psychos. Quote
Ace Nova Posted August 30, 2014 Author Posted August 30, 2014 Many of THEM are Iraqis. We didn't invade Iraq? Sure about that? Please clarify. Quote
AxlisOld Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 Don't care. So did the Prozac stop working?Prozac doesn't have anything to do with being jaded with morons that stand no chance agajnst us in an "invasion" and being sick of an entire clustefuck of an area. As someone not on Prozac, "Don't care." Quote
magisme Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 Many of THEM are Iraqis. We didn't invade Iraq? Sure about that? Please clarify.Not sure what I'm clarifying.You said ISIS invaded Iraq. It's more complicated than that since many of them are Iraqis. There's a difference between an invasion and an armed rebellion and a revolution and a criminal syndicate and a bunch of other things, and the difference matters when it comes to international law at the very least. Remember quaint shit like law?You said we didn't invade Iraq. Uh, yeah we did. A bunch of times. And as much as we like to talk about how we've withdrawn from Iraq, we still have tens of thousands of people there keeping a paternal eye on things. 1 Quote
Ace Nova Posted August 30, 2014 Author Posted August 30, 2014 Many of THEM are Iraqis. We didn't invade Iraq? Sure about that? Please clarify.Not sure what I'm clarifying.You said ISIS invaded Iraq. It's more complicated than that since many of them are Iraqis. There's a difference between an invasion and an armed rebellion and a revolution and a criminal syndicate and a bunch of other things, and the difference matters when it comes to international law at the very least. Remember quaint shit like law?You said we didn't invade Iraq. Uh, yeah we did. A bunch of times. And as much as we like to talk about how we've withdrawn from Iraq, we still have tens of thousands of people there keeping a paternal eye on things.No, we don't. Not with guns, anyway.And like I said, because some of the terrorists are of iraqi descent, that makes it ok? Seriously, dude? Like really? You like to spark off on retarded comments but that thought process is offensive to even the mentally challenged. ISIS is less than 1% of the Iraqi population....like, seriously....wtf. Quote
magisme Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 Yes, if I were saying that what ISIS is doing is OK, I should be called retarded and offensive. Lucky for me, I never said that once. 1 Quote
Ace Nova Posted August 30, 2014 Author Posted August 30, 2014 Yes, if I were saying that what ISIS is doing is OK, I should be called retarded and offensive. Lucky for me, I never said that once.Who ever said you said that? You stated that some of ISIS were Iraqi. So it was "complicated"....and you insinuated that the U.S. shouldn't get involved since some of them were Iraqi. Quote
magisme Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 Yes, if I were saying that what ISIS is doing is OK, I should be called retarded and offensive. Lucky for me, I never said that once.Who ever said you said that? You stated that some of ISIS were Iraqi. So it was "complicated"....and you insinuated that the U.S. shouldn't get involved since some of them were Iraqi.And like I said, because some of the terrorists are of iraqi descent, that makes it ok? Seriously, dude? Like really? You said it.....The US shouldn't get involved either way. Iraqis or not. More precisely, the US should stop being involved. That's imo.Whether they're Iraqis matters in terms of international law. That's not imo. That's just true facts. I know no one wants to talk about that. Bush made sure it became irrelevant and we've all passively accepted. Quote
Ace Nova Posted August 30, 2014 Author Posted August 30, 2014 (edited) Yes, if I were saying that what ISIS is doing is OK, I should be called retarded and offensive. Lucky for me, I never said that once.Who ever said you said that? You stated that some of ISIS were Iraqi. So it was "complicated"....and you insinuated that the U.S. shouldn't get involved since some of them were Iraqi.And like I said, because some of the terrorists are of iraqi descent, that makes it ok? Seriously, dude? Like really? You said it.....The US shouldn't get involved either way. Iraqis or not. More precisely, the US should stop being involved. That's imo.Whether they're Iraqis matters in terms of international law. That's not imo. That's just true facts. I know no one wants to talk about that. Bush made sure it became irrelevant and we've all passively accepted.Uhm...no, not really. Once anyone joins an internationally known terrorist organization, they are no longer considered anything but terrorists. BTW, this was checkmate about 10 posts ago.Anyway, since Captain America decided to start a thread about ISIS invasion of the U.S. through the Mexican Border, this has been absolutely confirmed as false. So mods, please feel free to delete or lock this thread. It is officially in the Captain America/Ratbrain realm.P.S., I still luv ya, Mags..... Edited August 30, 2014 by Kasanova King Quote
magisme Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 Yes, if I were saying that what ISIS is doing is OK, I should be called retarded and offensive. Lucky for me, I never said that once.Who ever said you said that? You stated that some of ISIS were Iraqi. So it was "complicated"....and you insinuated that the U.S. shouldn't get involved since some of them were Iraqi.And like I said, because some of the terrorists are of iraqi descent, that makes it ok? Seriously, dude? Like really? You said it.....The US shouldn't get involved either way. Iraqis or not. More precisely, the US should stop being involved. That's imo.Whether they're Iraqis matters in terms of international law. That's not imo. That's just true facts. I know no one wants to talk about that. Bush made sure it became irrelevant and we've all passively accepted.Uhm...no, not really. Once anyone joins an internationally known terrorist organization, they are no longer considered anything but terrorists. BTW, this was checkmate about 10 posts ago.Thank you for demonstrating my point perfectly. Although maybe I should change "passively accepted" to "actively promoted." Quote
Ace Nova Posted August 30, 2014 Author Posted August 30, 2014 Yes, if I were saying that what ISIS is doing is OK, I should be called retarded and offensive. Lucky for me, I never said that once.Who ever said you said that? You stated that some of ISIS were Iraqi. So it was "complicated"....and you insinuated that the U.S. shouldn't get involved since some of them were Iraqi.And like I said, because some of the terrorists are of iraqi descent, that makes it ok? Seriously, dude? Like really? You said it.....The US shouldn't get involved either way. Iraqis or not. More precisely, the US should stop being involved. That's imo.Whether they're Iraqis matters in terms of international law. That's not imo. That's just true facts. I know no one wants to talk about that. Bush made sure it became irrelevant and we've all passively accepted.Uhm...no, not really. Once anyone joins an internationally known terrorist organization, they are no longer considered anything but terrorists. BTW, this was checkmate about 10 posts ago.Thank you for demonstrating my point perfectly. Although maybe I should change "passively accepted" to "actively promoted." Or promoted actively, socially accepted....accepted passively.....maybe..... Quote
AdriftatSea Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 Now we know none of this is a big danger because why? Because Captain America has started a huge 'Let's Build a Bomb Shelter / Bunker in the Back Yard Because We Are All Gonna Die!!!' thread on it. 1 Quote
Georgy Zhukov Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 ISIS can have Texas. It is starting to look like a middle eastern country. Oil rigs and dried up lands thanks to fraking. Quote
Ace Nova Posted August 30, 2014 Author Posted August 30, 2014 ISIS can have Texas. It is starting to look like a middle eastern country. Oil rigs and dried up lands thanks to fraking. Just out of curiosity, haven't the oil rigs been there for over 50 years....as in 50 years before fracking? Quote
luciusfunk Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 ISIS can have Texas. It is starting to look like a middle eastern country. Oil rigs and dried up lands thanks to fraking. Just out of curiosity, haven't the oil rigs been there for over 50 years....as in 50 years before fracking?He's a Yankee. 1 Quote
Axl_morris Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 ISIS VS MEXICAN CARTEL That would be a good war. Quote
Not An FSB Agent Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 Yeehaw, just got my permit and Ima headin to El Paso to hunt me some hajis. ISIS can have Texas. It is starting to look like a middle eastern country. Oil rigs and dried up lands thanks to fraking. Just out of curiosity, haven't the oil rigs been there for over 50 years....as in 50 years before fracking?Been fracking in the oil patch since the 40s. Contrary to what most people seem to know, it is a safe process that has been used hundreds of thousands of times without one single instance of a fracked bore hole, or injection well, polluting the water table. Quote
arnold layne Posted August 30, 2014 Posted August 30, 2014 Whatever happened to Napalm? That orange stuff sprayed out of planes during the Viet Nam invasion. It would set anything on fire that it touched. Why doesn't anyone use that anymore? It causes diabetes. I am serious. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.