tr420 Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 lolll what a loser. axl cant even win a lawsuit these days, what a hack. Heres an idea, tubby. Instead of worrying about slash's face on a video game, how about you put your energy into.......hmmm I dont know....... rehearsing with your band or maybe even releasing a record?I think this has just added another few decades of hate for slash lol. Cant even beat him when slash isnt even trying.gg n00b.Why bother coming here if you think Axl is a loser? Only a loser would do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Roses Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 He lost 20$, but he's still rich as fuck. Damn, imagine what i can do with 20$. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisRoyalSweetness Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 lol axl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManetsBR Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 20 million is 20 million, man. It's a lot of money, and I'm sure Axl is pissed, specially because he was right on that case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisRoyalSweetness Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 i think this means there will be more private parties and possibly another vegas residency in axl's future. sucks for people who want a new album. great for me, since i didn't catch the first vegas residency, and will probably be able to score cheaper tickets for the second one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManetsBR Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Well, we can't know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisRoyalSweetness Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rock4eva Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 He's suing for $20 million but if he loses that doesn't mean HE has to pay that money does it? It just means he doesn't get that money - can someone set me straight on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisRoyalSweetness Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 (edited) he'll owe a bunch of legal fees.fuck activision. he should just sue doctor pepper again. Edited February 1, 2013 by HisRoyalSweetness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheesecake Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Yup what HRS says, he just won't win the $20mil but he still has to pay for the legal fees incurred. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wreckless Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 I dont know why people call Slash fat. He just looks yoked to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetness Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 (edited) dude no way, 40+ year old men who drank like camels throughout their teens, 20's and 30's have bloated guts? I can't fucking believe it.Duff and Izzy are really the only guys who managed to take good care of themselves in the long run, that said Axl and Slash don't look bad for their age at allwhats really funny about the picture above is that he's running into the water with a damn boogie board Edited February 1, 2013 by sweetness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 He's suing for $20 million but if he loses that doesn't mean HE has to pay that money does it? It just means he doesn't get that money - can someone set me straight on this?Of course. I watch The Good Wife I know the score. He sued them for 20 mil, so he's trying to get money from them. I guess he could get 10 mil or out of court settlement. It's probably a matter for principle. I think we all know it looks fishy.But like people say court fees, maybe he pays his lawyers anyway. So they were on a bonus. So the court fees, it can't be millions can it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DizzyReedsexmachine Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 It is a great time to be a fakeGNR fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Larry Azoff is really going to get it on CD II. Activision, Dr Pepper are all in for a raping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 A Chinese Democracy game? What are you supposed to do on that? Play along to the overdubs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 It would be like Restaurant Story. Noodle Shop - you maintain the tables, keep the noodles cooking, serve the customers. make much money.All these cases come down to the wire, it's only when the judge issues the final verdict that the lawyers go to work. They have to prove that Activision lied to Axl and there was more than a verbal agreement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
izzydoezit Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 The fact that he wanted the man who wrote Jungle's riff, not to appear along with the song in the video game shows what a pathetic loser Axl is. Did he excpect Activision would put BBF there? Then nobody would even buy it.Immature son of a bitch now is gonna pay for a lot of legal fees. Suck it Axl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndreCC Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Hopefuly Axl will learn his lesson! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DizzyReedsexmachine Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 The fact that he wanted the man who wrote Jungle's riff, not to appear along with the song in the video game shows what a pathetic loser Axl is. Did he excpect Activision would put BBF there? Then nobody would even buy it.Immature son of a bitch now is gonna pay for a lot of legal fees. Suck it Axl. what a loser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bacardimayne Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 The fact that he wanted the man who wrote Jungle's riff, not to appear along with the song in the video game shows what a pathetic loser Axl is. Did he excpect Activision would put BBF there? Then nobody would even buy it.Immature son of a bitch now is gonna pay for a lot of legal fees. Suck it Axl.Can you change your avatar so I don't associate a great show with incessant bitterness and projection? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
izzydoezit Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 by emphasizing and reinforcing an association between Slash and GUNS N' ROSES and the band's song 'Welcome to the Jungle'.The fact that he wanted the man who wrote Jungle's riff, not to appear along with the song in the video game shows what a pathetic loser Axl is. Did he excpect Activision would put BBF there? Then nobody would even buy it.Immature son of a bitch now is gonna pay for a lot of legal fees. Suck it Axl.Can you change your avatar so I don't associate a great show with incessant bitterness and projection? Thanks.I was having the same problem associating Kiedis who I love, with assholeness, but thankfully you've removed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bacardimayne Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 (edited) by emphasizing and reinforcing an association between Slash and GUNS N' ROSES and the band's song 'Welcome to the Jungle'.What's the problem? Morals aside, GNR is Axl's brand name, and he doesn't want it officially associated with certain people. Where is he legally wrong?I was having the same problem associating Kiedis who I love, with assholeness, but thankfully you've removed it. You like something? Color me surprised. Edited February 1, 2013 by bacardimayne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
izzydoezit Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 by emphasizing and reinforcing an association between Slash and GUNS N' ROSES and the band's song 'Welcome to the Jungle'.What's the problem? Morals aside, GNR is Axl's brand name, and he doesn't want it officially associated with certain people. Where is he legally wrong?I was having the same problem associating Kiedis who I love, with assholeness, but thankfully you've removed it. You like something? Color me surprised.Yes I like lot of things. GNR included. Just not fakeGNR.Anyway, to answer to your question above, I am not in the position to analyze the issue legally. The judges will do that and apparently they don't seem to agree with Axl.I am taking this as a fan of WTTJ. It is simply ridiculous to demand not to have an association between Slash and WTTJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 It's probably something the Activivision lawyers worked out before hand. Like distract him with false promises off the record til it goes beyong the staute of libs then release the game with Slash on it. All for a buck.I had the first Activision console with Pitfall. I should have got an Atari. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts