Aussiegun Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Magically, say in 1998 - Slash, Duff, Izzy and Steven wanted to continue a group with a new singer, either an Axl soundalike or maybe one of the singers Slash has dabbled with. Maybe they could call it Appetite for Destruction or GNR (just to piss off Axl)Also Magically in 1998 - Axl managed to get a band together containing the (in your opinion) best of the Chinese Democracy players. Obviously he'd still call it Guns N Roses.Who would you prefer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bacardimayne Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Axl/Finck/Bucket/Tobias/Stinson/Pitman/Reed/BrainI'd take that over absolutely anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheapJon Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 null vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Glow Inc. Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Mike Patton, Buckethead, Bumblefoot, Richard Fortus ( optional ), Duff, Brain, Charlie Clouser. Pretty much my dream band...As regards the OP's question : mmmh, OG Guns with someone else could work but the guy needs to have not only a great voice but also a great attitude that makes him stand out.I love Axl's Guns ( though I wouldn't call them Guns n' Roses ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovim Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Axl/Finck/Bucket/Tobias/Stinson/Pitman/Reed/BrainI'd take that over absolutely anything.This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seely Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Axl/Bucket/DJ/Richard/Brain/Dizzy/Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GNR123GNR456 Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 (edited) Axl's GN'RGuns N' Roses without Axl is'nt Guns' N Roses. It would be another Van Halen, only worse. You can replace the guitar, you can't replace a voice. Edited January 3, 2011 by GNR123GNR456 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bacardimayne Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Axl's GN'RGuns N' Roses without Axl is'nt Guns' N Roses. It would be another Van Halen, only worse. You can replace the guitar, you can't replace a voice.In Van Halen's case, I'd say it's the opposite. Some of the Van Hagar stuff was brilliant. Van Halen with Roth and no Eddie would most likely be awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moreblack Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 It would be another Van Halenthere was nothing wrong with VH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussiegun Posted January 3, 2011 Author Share Posted January 3, 2011 Axl's GN'RGuns N' Roses without Axl is'nt Guns' N Roses. It would be another Van Halen, only worse. You can replace the guitar, you can't replace a voice.Dont tell AC/DC that . It does help though that Back in Black became their biggest album. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrandyk Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Axl's GN'RGuns N' Roses without Axl is'nt Guns' N Roses. It would be another Van Halen, only worse. You can replace the guitar, you can't replace a voice.In Van Halen's case, I'd say it's the opposite. Some of the Van Hagar stuff was brilliant. Van Halen with Roth and no Eddie would most likely be awful.Your opinion loses so much value to me everytime you post. Van Hagar was an abomination.And I would take just Slash on his own with a different singer if he was playing nearly as many GNR songs Axl is, Axl of the past 15 years has been nothing but a disappointment. I would much rather have a band that can put out two albums in a decade and have successfull tours that go off without a hitch. None of this one lackluster album, completing tours at a 33% success rate, 2 hours late, short setlist, apathetic band with the possibility of a tantrum ending the show bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Glow Inc. Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 apathetic band lolwut ?Have you seen the current lineup live ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrandyk Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 apathetic band lolwut ?Have you seen the current lineup live ?Yes, Bumblefoot simply left during the show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Glow Inc. Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Sturgis eh ?At the show I was at, 4tus and DJ probably ran more kilometers in three hours than I've ever have in my entire life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cdlove Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 apathetic band lolwut ?Have you seen the current lineup live ?Yes, Bumblefoot simply left during the show.The reasoning for leaving for 3 songs was actually proof that Bumble cared if anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julia Alexandra Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 Of course i prefer Axl's Guns n Roses.Axl is irreplaceable and he'll always be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickzark Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 without AXL is no meaning.His voice is what makes this band Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moreblack Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 without AXL is no meaning. His voice is one part of the elements of what makes this bandfixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scaramouche Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 The current band. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickzark Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 without AXL is no meaning. His voice is one part of the elements of what makes this bandfixed. Sorry for my english.... Thanks for fixing it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rachel Gunner Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 (edited) I prefer Axl's GN'R. Edited January 9, 2011 by Rachel Gunner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewbacca Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Axl's Guns, definetely. I just love to see this more experimental, metallic, less vintage sounding side of GN'R. TWAT's solo is my all-time favorite from Guns. They also gave low tunings a try with Better! rock1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Satanisk_Slakt Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Null vote. It should be them all or not at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bumble's Bridge Pickup Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Axl's Guns, definetely. I just love to see this more experimental, metallic, less vintage sounding side of GN'R. TWAT's solo is my all-time favorite from Guns. They also gave low tunings a try with Better! rock1Nah Shackler's and Scraped are where the low tunings are at, the lowest note on Better is just a C# Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ynex Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 No Axl, no Guns! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts