Jordan Rose Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Now, there's been some concern that if we play 5 or 6 new songs then there can't be that many more on the album. Au contrere, mon frere. We're just playing the songs we're not considering putting out as singles or anything. So, you'll get 18 songs and about 10 extra tracks. And when the record company feel that has run its course, then you'll get it all over again. And by that time, I should be done with the third album. So, we'll see if all goes well, boys and girls, and if Uncle Axl proves to be an asshole, we'll have to see the jury's still out. When they play Rio this year it will be over 9 years since Axl said that and it's a sure bet they'll be playing the same set with the same 'new' songs plus Sorry and This I Love which seem to be the only others he feels able to sing live on a regular basis. And it's all because of 'the biz' according to Axl. I'm not bitching, just reflecting. Axl, Bucket, Robin and Brain could have taken over the world by now and instead Axl's a decade older and running out of time to have a decent stab at singing The General live before his voice starts deteriorating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LXA Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 CD fanboys in 3....2....1.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Rose Posted June 16, 2011 Author Share Posted June 16, 2011 I'm a CD fanboy. The live versions since 01.01.01, the leaks and the album itself have all but saved my life over the last 10 years. If I could only take one record to a desert island it would be CD. Doesn't change the reality that being a long term supporter of Axl has turned out to be massively disappointing and depressing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lbo Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 I'm a CD fanboy. The live versions since 01.01.01, the leaks and the album itself have all but saved my life over the last 10 years. If I could only take one record to a desert island it would be CD. Doesn't change the reality that being a long term supporter of Axl has turned out to be massively disappointing and depressing.Why take any cd to a deserted island? Bring a knife! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
axl8302 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 I'm a CD fanboy. The live versions since 01.01.01, the leaks and the album itself have all but saved my life over the last 10 years. If I could only take one record to a desert island it would be CD. Doesn't change the reality that being a long term supporter of Axl has turned out to be massively disappointing and depressing.Why take any cd to a deserted island? Bring a knife! and a fit bird and some jager. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seely Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 I'm a CD fanboy. The live versions since 01.01.01, the leaks and the album itself have all but saved my life over the last 10 years. If I could only take one record to a desert island it would be CD. Doesn't change the reality that being a long term supporter of Axl has turned out to be massively disappointing and depressing.Why take any cd to a deserted island? Bring a knife! and a fit bird and some jager.With a knife? Combined with the Jager, that could get messy very quicklyOn topic: Who knows about Rio. So far each one has signaled the start of something new....signs from DJ are promising, Axl still seems to have fire in his belly musically, there's now the Azoff lawsuit settled with terms including tour plans (It said so in the announcement), and now news of more dates.If nothing else, at least GN'R are active. More thn could be said for 03-05. There may be no confirmation of an album, but there's at least confirmation of future plans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ali Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Now, there's been some concern that if we play 5 or 6 new songs then there can't be that many more on the album. Au contrere, mon frere. We're just playing the songs we're not considering putting out as singles or anything. So, you'll get 18 songs and about 10 extra tracks. And when the record company feel that has run its course, then you'll get it all over again. And by that time, I should be done with the third album. So, we'll see if all goes well, boys and girls, and if Uncle Axl proves to be an asshole, we'll have to see the jury's still out. When they play Rio this year it will be over 9 years since Axl said that and it's a sure bet they'll be playing the same set with the same 'new' songs plus Sorry and This I Love which seem to be the only others he feels able to sing live on a regular basis. And it's all because of 'the biz' according to Axl. I'm not bitching, just reflecting. Axl, Bucket, Robin and Brain could have taken over the world by now and instead Axl's a decade older and running out of time to have a decent stab at singing The General live before his voice starts deteriorating.O.k. Great. Thanks for sharing.Ali Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetness Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Everyone knows the band is dysfunctional and Axl's word means nothing whether they admit it or not, this is just another of many examples and it really isn't anything new. You can read it over and over again but it doesn't mean a damn thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Use Your Delusion 1 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 the amount of bullshit that comes from Axl's mouth...we should be happy to have a band still playing, let along a album released in the past 10 years don't get me wrong, but still rediculous eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
star Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 Everyone knows the band is dysfunctional and Axl's word means nothing whether they admit it or not, this is just another of many examples and it really isn't anything new. You can read it over and over again but it doesn't mean a damn thing+1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NewGNRnOldGNR Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 (edited) Axl promised too much (the whole idea got incredibly complicated when really it should have been kept to one rational agenda of an album) - you can dwell on the unhappening of the "great Chinese Democracy ambition" or realise it was inspired by a genuine sincerity and enthusiasm (the reality rogue elements got involved also didn't help). The constant considering of "what could have been" or Axl's general rationality is actually unhealthy and futile. The pessimism is needless - clearly Axl is attempting to rebuild Guns N' Roses again and will apply his knowledge of past mistakes to the present intention which is evidently a new beginning (for this we should be appreciative and optimistic given the horrible circumstances in which "Chinese Democracy" "dropped" - the dejection must have been incomprehensible in terms of intensity). The enthusiasm of figures like Dj seems to be rubbing off on Axl so I don't really see why we should repeatedly introduce the doom and gloom of past events to this exciting and prosperous period in the ever unfolding history of GN'R. Edited June 16, 2011 by NewGNRnOldGNR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
star Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 (edited) ..and what about all that stuff about The Blues and Madgascar simply being B side tracks- implying they might not make the album, as there were supior tracks due anytime soon Edited June 16, 2011 by star Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jellyzero Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 I've brought that up before. Where are the big guns? What did he consider to be the "big guns" that were going to be singles if all the songs that they were playing on tour are the same ones that got released as singles that he said himself were NOT going to be singles? (sorry for the run on) Why weren't they on the album? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seely Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 I've brought that up before. Where are the big guns? What did he consider to be the "big guns" that were going to be singles if all the songs that they were playing on tour are the same ones that got released as singles that he said himself were NOT going to be singles? (sorry for the run on) Why weren't they on the album?All subjective, isn't it.But i'd say TWAT, Better and This I Love were fairly 'big guns' (Even if TIL wasn't meant to be on the album initialy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
axl8302 Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 ..and what about all that stuff about The Blues and Madgascar simply being B side tracks- implying they might not make the album, as there were supior tracks due anytime soon He NEVER said that they were B sides, that's just you TROLLING. He said they weren't considering putting them out as singles or anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NewGNRnOldGNR Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 ..and what about all that stuff about The Blues and Madgascar simply being B side tracksThere was clearly a point where Axl's mentality changed from "wanting to drop a last great album" to ensuring the sustainability of GN'R. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Binge_And_Slash Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 ..and what about all that stuff about The Blues and Madgascar simply being B side tracks- implying they might not make the album, as there were supior tracks due anytime soon He NEVER said that they were B sides, that's just you TROLLING. He said they weren't considering putting them out as singles or anything.No, actually, he did. I can't remember the exact quote or context but it was someone asking about the new tracks they were playing on the 02 tour to which he said he doesn't regard them as "anything more than B-Sides, maybe" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
axl8302 Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 ..and what about all that stuff about The Blues and Madgascar simply being B side tracks- implying they might not make the album, as there were supior tracks due anytime soon He NEVER said that they were B sides, that's just you TROLLING. He said they weren't considering putting them out as singles or anything.No, actually, he did. I can't remember the exact quote or context but it was someone asking about the new tracks they were playing on the 02 tour to which he said he doesn't regard them as "anything more than B-Sides, maybe"prove it or GTFO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
star Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 ..and what about all that stuff about The Blues and Madgascar simply being B side tracks- implying they might not make the album, as there were supior tracks due anytime soon He NEVER said that they were B sides, that's just you TROLLING. He said they weren't considering putting them out as singles or anything.No, actually, he did. I can't remember the exact quote or context but it was someone asking about the new tracks they were playing on the 02 tour to which he said he doesn't regard them as "anything more than B-Sides, maybe"Your sig: 400x178 25KB - This breaks the MYGNR Forum rulesEveryone knows the band is dysfunctional and Axl's word means nothing whether they admit it or not, this is just another of many examples and it really isn't anything new. You can read it over and over again but it doesn't mean a damn thingYour sig is 27KB - This breaks the MYGNR Forum rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris 55 Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 On topic: Who knows about Rio. So far each one has signaled the start of something new....signs from DJ are promising, Axl still seems to have fire in his belly musically, there's now the Azoff lawsuit settled with terms including tour plans (It said so in the announcement), and now news of more dates.If nothing else, at least GN'R are active. More thn could be said for 03-05. There may be no confirmation of an album, but there's at least confirmation of future plans.Yeah that doesn't mean anything. Tommy for example was saying CD was done and they were finalizing the artwork etc. CD didn't come out for a few more years after he said that. Until there's an actual solid release date, everything else is just talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iftheworld Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 CD fanboys in 3....2....1..Please grow up kid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovim Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 I thought Catcher In The Rye was a 'big gun' the first time I heard it.Plans change, people rethink what they wanted to do. As long as Axl and the band can deliver the live performances on the level of the recent tour, and put out material as good as Chinese Democracy, I believe it's worth going through all the failed attempts, mistakes, and other less then ideal scenarios.I still think Axl wants to follow his vision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LXA Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 CD fanboys in 3....2....1..Please grow up kid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 normally I think th BB deal changed things. But maybe it was Bucket, when he left a lot of the material just became impossible to present live, without him to play it, it was going to be Axl n Bucket show but in the end Axl just put out his songs on a CD. He has more songs but the Bucket material, unless he liked it got shelved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts