Huge fan Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 (edited) http://www.feelnumb.com/2014/11/16/axl-rose-has-face-blurred-out-in-new-slash-documentary/While watching the new Slash documentary “Slash Raised On The Sunset Strip” about the rise of Slash and stories about his time in Guns N’ Roses, in one part of the documentary they talk about the first band photo taken of the original Guns N’ Roses line-up sitting at a booth at Los Angeles’ famous Canter's Deli. The photo was taken on June 1, 1985 and still hangs above the actual booth they were in at Canter's.Funny thing is, when the photo was shown in "Slash Raised on the Sunset Strip", the face of Axl Rose is blurred out. I wonder if this “blurring” was at the request of Rose or blurred by Slash and the producers to avoid Axl somehow suing them. Can’t we all just get along??? Edited November 23, 2014 by Huge fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combos Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Blood be boilin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosaj Thing Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvH Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Childishly ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post RussTCB Posted November 23, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted November 23, 2014 Blood be boilin' 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFA Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Axl is pathetic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stella Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 To be fair, that is a common documentary thing: if there's a private photo and one of the subjects in it hasn't consented to be in the documentary, they will blur the face. In the case of Slash's documentary they might not have even asked Axl's consent; they might have blurred him proactively because they figured he'd mind and the others wouldn't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Nosaj Thing Posted November 23, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted November 23, 2014 But maybe the producers blurred out Axl face by a request of Slash's camp.Ali 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Damn_Smooth Posted November 23, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted November 23, 2014 Axl is pathetic Source that Axl had any say in it? 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncivil war Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 To be fair, that is a common documentary thing: if there's a private photo and one of the subjects in it hasn't consented to be in the documentary, they will blur the face. In the case of Slash's documentary they might not have even asked Axl's consent; they might have blurred him proactively because they figured he'd mind and the others wouldn't.This.If they waited for permission to use Axl's image, the documentary would never have been aired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facekicker Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 It would be hilarious if Slash blurred it out thinking that's what Axl would want in an effort to avoid confrontation. Only for Axl to get paranoid and see it as an attempt to undermine him and launch yet another lawsuit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magisme Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Doesn't one of our members run a slashfans site or something? Surely they can get to the bottom of this. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Glow Inc. Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 this band... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosaj Thing Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Doesn't one of our members run a slashfans site or something? Surely they can get to the bottom of this.That's Slash2Baz.Sure, he can ask them about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damn_Smooth Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Doesn't one of our members run a slashfans site or something? Surely they can get to the bottom of this.Yeah, they have a penchant for interviewing everybody else nobody gives a shit about. They should be able to get to the bottom here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussTCB Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Axl is pathetic Source that Axl had any say in it?This.I'm all for calling Axl out when it's needed, but there's zero proof that he's even aware of this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
username Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Axl is pathetic Source that Axl had any say in it?This.I'm all for calling Axl out when it's needed, but there's zero proof that he's even aware of this.Agreed. Might've gone down without his knowing. Maybe it was Team Complaints or some lawyers. No permission to use Axl's likeness or whatever. IF he made that call himself though, that's just pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacula Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 First Duff McKagan called his supergroup with Chad Smith and Mike McCready I Pissed My Pants. Now Slash blurred Axl's face out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvH Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Axl is pathetic Why are you saying that, Izzy? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wkuk04 Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Its all about Slash... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IncitingChaos Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Probably one of those situations where someone made the decision to blur him out "just in case"I doubt they would go through the trouble of asking Axl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 But then Axl will probably sue him anyway for, erasing him from history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wkuk04 Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Waiting for Prostitute Coma's opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darknightfan Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 He has a book why does he need a documentary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damn_Smooth Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 He has a book why does he need a documentary?$ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts