Rolling Stones 50th thread

[Zint]

I was able to pull up a single seat for the Thursday show..450 bucks, third level, sidestage..

That plus airfare, I can't justify it.

I'm going to loot around a bit on the Thursday show, if I can pop something up that I can live with, I just might.

[Powerage5]

I'll be checking eBay, never know what you may find. We got our 2005 tickets below face value on eBay

[classicrawker]

I don't know this for sure but I would not get too dissapointed in missing out on tickets as based on comments from Ronnie Woods and Keef these will not be the only shows for them. I would expect dates for 2013 to be announced eventually...........

[Zint]

Yeah honestly I can't see them spending the cash on a new "lips" stage and a tongue that sticks out into the audience with only 4 shows on the menu.

(that was the premise of the stage design on the '78 tour btw)

[Zint]

[Zint]

[Zint]

extremely raw (audio) of them rehearsing I Wanna Be Your Man

[James Bond]

They don't play half bad for a bunch of old guys.

Seriously though, they still sound great. Mick especially. After all these years he still has a great voice. Charlie is probably the most impressive though. At 71 he's still a solid drummer.

[classicrawker]

Inside the Rolling Stones' Reunion

Mick Jagger and Keith Richards tell all about the band's 50th-anniversary blowout

By BRIAN HIATT

October 24, 2012 7:00 AM ET

The Rolling Stones

Martin Philbey/Redferns

After half a century of hits, addictions, mayhem and enough bad blood to flood the Thames, the

Adds Keith Richards, "To keep a band together this long, let alone a rock & roll band, is probably unique in musical history. After all, that's what I was born for: to make musical history." What the Stones have announced so far is not quite a tour: They're playing four shows this year, on November 25th and 29th at London's O2 arena, and on December 13th and 15th at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey. But Richards doubts they'll end there. "My experience with the Rolling Stones," he says, "is that once the juggernaut starts rolling, it ain't gonna stop. So without sort of saying definitely yes – yeah. We ain't doing all this for four gigs!"

Rare and Intimate Pictures of the Rolling Stones

The Stones expect former guitarist Mick Taylor (who quit in 1974) and founding bassist Bill Wyman (gone since '93) to come on board for the four shows, but only as guests on a few songs. Richards emphasizes that longtime touring bassist Darryl Jones isn't going anywhere. "Darryl doesn't get enough recognition," says Richards. "He and Bill can talk about songs they want to step in and out of." For the final show in Newark (to be broadcast live on pay-per-view), more guests are likely to pop by – Ron Wood drops names like Eric Clapton and Jeff Beck as possibilities.

The band shrugs off grumbling about the $800-plus it's charging for the best tickets. "As Keith said, 'Sounds about right,'" says Wood. "I'd pay it! We already spent, like, a million on rehearsing, and we're not even halfway through. And the stage is going to cost millions and millions."

The Stones also have a new career-spanning documentary, Crossfire Hurricane, directed by Brett Morgen, that debuts on HBO on November 15th. In less than two hours, the film races through history from the band's earliest shows at the Marquee Club to the arrival of Wood, keeping a relatively light tone throughout. "I never wanted to make a nostalgic movie," says Jagger. "It's got to be kind of irreverent."

One prerequisite for the Rolling Stones' reunion was an apology from Richards to Jagger for the stream of insults the guitarist included in Life, his bestselling 2011 memoir. "He did apologize, to my face," says Jagger quietly. "So you have to put all that sort of stuff away. Water under the bridge, really. Hopefully, you know, we can carry on working."

Adds Richards, "It was something to get out of the bloody way so we could get the band on the road. You know, I'll say sorry to God if you like. I don't give a shit. I said, 'Look forward, brother, look forward.' If you was married to somebody for 50 years, you can have your little spats here and there, and we don't mind having them in public occasionally. We can't get divorced – we're doing it for the kids!"

"Doom and Gloom," the newly recorded single from the band's latest greatest-hits collection, GRRR!, sounds more or less like classic Stones, albeit with modern production tweaks. But that doesn't mean that Jagger and Richards have revived their songwriting partnership quite yet. The song began as a demo that Jagger made on his own, and even the opening guitar riff turns out to be Jagger playing, not Richards. "I don't give a damn," says Richards. "He'd never have learned how to play that without me teaching him how to do it."

Another factor in the long hiatus since the 2007 finale of the Bigger Bang tour was Wood's struggle with alcohol addiction. He's now in his third year of sobriety, and he expects to keep it up on the road, though previous tours were always a challenge. "Looking back," says Wood, "there was always that secret vodka, like the one before I'd go onstage. Which was never just one, anyway."

Richards is also drinking significantly less. "I don't get ridiculous," he says. "I like a glass of wine with my meal and everything, but I've given up sort of waking up and having a drink, you know? I gave up smack, I can give up anything. No big deal to me, I do it to impress other people. But if they come up with a great new drug, I'll be the first one on it, believe me."

Richards argues that his substance use, or lack thereof, has little effect on his playing, but Wood disagrees. "Keith is a pleasure to play with now," Wood says. "It was a pain on the last tour toward the end, because he was really going for it on the drinking and denial. But now he's realized that he has gotta look after himself." Since Richards isn't completely sober, Wood is inclined to keep an eye on him. "I'm not going to preach to him," he says. "I will step in if I see any danger."

The Stones seem genuinely excited about their recent rehearsals in Paris, which have included rarely played songs such as the Lennon-McCartney-penned "I Wanna Be Your Man" and the Aftermath ballad "Lady Jane." "Going in, one thinks, 'Oh, my Christ, I'm a doddering old man,'" says Richards. "But it's not true! The payoff from the energy that's been wound up over the five years is incredible."

For Jagger, performing with the Stones means living up to a reputation as an ageless physical marvel, which he insists is highly exaggerated. "Everyone's human," he says, "and you can't really expect it to last forever. On the other hand, you try to keep yourself in shape. Obviously you can't do the same things [onstage] you did when you were 19, so you have to do other things. There's no miracles in life." But he knows that fans expect him to somehow be an exception: "It's a bit of a burden, really, isn't it? I better be OK, at least."

If anything, the physical burden is even harder on 71-year-old Charlie Watts, who has a masseuse on hand for his back after every rehearsal. "It takes a heavy toll playing them drums," says Wood, "to make it look like he's doing nothing, and to make it sound like those firecrackers going off. It all goes to his back, you know? He suffers terribly."

The Stones are bracing themselves to be asked yet again if this could be the last time. But even if it was, they'd never tell you. "That's not a card, in my opinion, that should be played," says Jagger, who says he'd like to record another Stones album eventually. "I know lots of people do play that card, but it nearly always backfires on them."

It's not lost on the Rolling Stones that they won't be alone on the road this winter, with so many of their peers – Bob Dylan, the Who and Paul McCartney, to name a few – also playing to huge audiences at this very late date. "What can you say?" Richards says. "It's a hell of a generation."

Read more: http://www.rollingst...4#ixzz2AST0Fmup

Edited October 27, 2012 by classicrawker

[wasted]

I was just reading that this album will have 3 CDs with 50 tracks, 4 CDs with 80 tracks, Vinyl 50 tracks.

I'm I missing something or getting this wrong? 50 tracks?

anyone know?

At first I wasn't excited about a new Stones, like A Bigger Bang was fine some good tracks but ultimately not better than the past. So you know it will be fun but not 50 tracks fun.

[axlslash]

Pretty sure it's a greatest hits box set with a few new songs

[wasted]

Ok, that's what I was thinking. It couldn't be 50 new songs...

[Guest Len B'stard]

fuckin' hell, well look who it ain't, back from the dead, how you doing winner? Hope you're stickin' around, you're needed!

[wasted]

The internet needs me.

[dalsh327]

This is more of a comprehensive singles (they edited down some of the songs) hits package than Forty Licks was, and in chronological order, but they prob. should've put together a 2 CD/1DVD package going from Undercover to the Some GIrls & Exile reissues. Jump Back should've covered the Ron Wood era more.

A comprehensive Stones collection would take up 8-10 CDs if they were going to pad it with live versions, alternate takes, remixes, etc, but they still want people to buy the back catalog.

[wasted]

Doom and Gloom is a cool track.

I feel disappointed its not 50 new tracks. That would be awesome.

Still prob buy it around Xmas. It's like representing them for another tour. I should feel ripped off but it's like got keep them fueled to put out a few more tracks like D&G.

[classicrawker]

It is an updated greatest hits package with 2 new songs added as incentive to the hardcore fans who already have all the offical albums to buy it.....

[username]

Quite honestly it feels like a bit of a cash grab towards the hardcore stones fans. Basically you're horribly overplaying for 2 new songs. The rest are already on countless other compilations and the average stones fan probably owns most albums they're on as well.

[Zint]

GRRR!!!

PFTT!!!

[dalsh327]

Quite honestly it feels like a bit of a cash grab towards the hardcore stones fans. Basically you're horribly overplaying for 2 new songs. The rest are already on countless other compilations and the average stones fan probably owns most albums they're on as well.

There was way too many greatest hits put out up to 1971, and the Stones had no control over it. They've been pretty good about not putting out more greatest hits albums than studio albums, and I'm sure it was intentional.

[Black Sabbath]

I wish it was 50 fucking new songs!!

[wasted]

I think they should do a triple album. they have all the power to do it.

[Zint]

Has anyone picked up the Stones 50 book yet?

[username]

Has anyone picked up the Stones 50 book yet?

Yup! The week it came out. Amazing pictures and some great comments by the guys as well. Loved it!

[username]

Quite honestly it feels like a bit of a cash grab towards the hardcore stones fans. Basically you're horribly overplaying for 2 new songs. The rest are already on countless other compilations and the average stones fan probably owns most albums they're on as well.

There was way too many greatest hits put out up to 1971, and the Stones had no control over it. They've been pretty good about not putting out more greatest hits albums than studio albums, and I'm sure it was intentional.

True... There have to be at least 20 or maybe even 30 Stones compilations... Most of them not worth it at all.

I've always enjoyed The Singles Collection though. It's the only Stones compilation I actually bought.

I suppose Forty Licks is worth it as well. But the rest.... big fat meh.