Graeme Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Don't know. It is full of homosexuals kissing before the watershed.Since when was kissing before the watershed disallowed? Every soap has to have the proper quota of 'gays'. The homosexualisation of British television. Of course your lot are into that being as you wear skirts. I almost think you're being serious... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 (edited) IT'S OVER THE LINE! IT'S OVER THE FUCKIN LINE!!! FUCKIN' CHEAT!!! Edited January 16, 2016 by Len B'stard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PappyTron Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Thank God Big Ron wasn't miked up more often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtariLegend Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 (edited) Don't know. It is full of homosexuals kissing before the watershed.Since when was kissing before the watershed disallowed? Every soap has to have the proper quota of 'gays'. I almost think you're being serious...Although I don't agree with Daisy on almost anything. He does have a point. On the quota for British "soaps" part at least.There was a point a few years ago where every other character introduced to those kind of shows was either gay, lesbian, transgender, or a victim of child abuse. I think it was Coronation Street which at one point had almost quarter of it's characters fall under those stereotypes. Now diversity is always important, but so is moderation and being "proportionate". I do though remember when Brookside moved to the later time slot after the ratings plummeted. I specifically remember Max borderline fingering Jacqui though (while flicking the channel). Who'd have thought it'd be cancelled soon after?Anyway it's all trash TV and this probably isn't a football related discussion . Edited January 17, 2016 by AtariLegend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Thank God Big Ron wasn't miked up more often.I wish he was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graeme Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Don't know. It is full of homosexuals kissing before the watershed.Since when was kissing before the watershed disallowed? Every soap has to have the proper quota of 'gays'. I almost think you're being serious...Although I don't agree with Daisy on almost anything. He does have a point. On the quota for British "soaps" part at least.There was a point a few years ago where every other character introduced to those kind of shows was either gay, lesbian, transgender, or a victim of child abuse. I think it was Coronation Street which at one point had almost quarter of it's characters fall under those stereotypes. Now diversity is always important, but so is moderation and being "proportionate". I do though remember when Brookside moved to the later time slot after the ratings plummeted. I specifically remember Max borderline fingering Jacqui though (while flicking the channel). Who'd have thought it'd be cancelled soon after?Anyway it's all trash TV and this probably isn't a football related discussion .So, they kinda went from decades of not acknowledging that homosexuality exists at all to an unrealistically high level of representation as an unsophisticated effort at compensating? I guess it's all plot devices in a fairly trashy fictional narrative anyway, I doubt the writers are concerned with analysing demographic data to ensure that their number of homosexual characters is reflective of the societal reality.I was more baffled by the Dark-Ages-esque idea that homosexual kissing in particular should be after the watershed, as though it's more of an obscenity than heterosexual kissing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Don't know. It is full of homosexuals kissing before the watershed.Since when was kissing before the watershed disallowed? Every soap has to have the proper quota of 'gays'. I almost think you're being serious...Although I don't agree with Daisy on almost anything. He does have a point. On the quota for British "soaps" part at least.There was a point a few years ago where every other character introduced to those kind of shows was either gay, lesbian, transgender, or a victim of child abuse. I think it was Coronation Street which at one point had almost quarter of it's characters fall under those stereotypes. Now diversity is always important, but so is moderation and being "proportionate". I do though remember when Brookside moved to the later time slot after the ratings plummeted. I specifically remember Max borderline fingering Jacqui though (while flicking the channel). Who'd have thought it'd be cancelled soon after?Anyway it's all trash TV and this probably isn't a football related discussion .So, they kinda went from decades of not acknowledging that homosexuality exists at all to an unrealistically high level of representation as an unsophisticated effort at compensating? I guess it's all plot devices in a fairly trashy fictional narrative anyway, I doubt the writers are concerned with analysing demographic data to ensure that their number of homosexual characters is reflective of the societal reality.I was more baffled by the Dark-Ages-esque idea that homosexual kissing in particular should be after the watershed, as though it's more of an obscenity than heterosexual kissing...Call me ''something from the dark ages'' or a ''bigot'' but I do not want my nephews to be exposed to homosexual kissing and will promptly remove them from the room if it appears on screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 COME ON SCOUSERS!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Oh get a decent shot off Liverpool, FFS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris1989 Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Lol, another special atmosphere at AnFAILED today. If they can't get up for that they what can they get up for. Answer? Certainly not work.I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Cech got us that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moreblack Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 (edited) These will never not be a joy to win. Especially there.https://streamable.com/pud7 Edited January 17, 2016 by moreblack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graeme Posted January 17, 2016 Share Posted January 17, 2016 Don't know. It is full of homosexuals kissing before the watershed.Since when was kissing before the watershed disallowed? Every soap has to have the proper quota of 'gays'. I almost think you're being serious...Although I don't agree with Daisy on almost anything. He does have a point. On the quota for British "soaps" part at least.There was a point a few years ago where every other character introduced to those kind of shows was either gay, lesbian, transgender, or a victim of child abuse. I think it was Coronation Street which at one point had almost quarter of it's characters fall under those stereotypes. Now diversity is always important, but so is moderation and being "proportionate". I do though remember when Brookside moved to the later time slot after the ratings plummeted. I specifically remember Max borderline fingering Jacqui though (while flicking the channel). Who'd have thought it'd be cancelled soon after?Anyway it's all trash TV and this probably isn't a football related discussion .So, they kinda went from decades of not acknowledging that homosexuality exists at all to an unrealistically high level of representation as an unsophisticated effort at compensating? I guess it's all plot devices in a fairly trashy fictional narrative anyway, I doubt the writers are concerned with analysing demographic data to ensure that their number of homosexual characters is reflective of the societal reality.I was more baffled by the Dark-Ages-esque idea that homosexual kissing in particular should be after the watershed, as though it's more of an obscenity than heterosexual kissing...Call me ''something from the dark ages'' or a ''bigot'' but I do not want my nephews to be exposed to homosexual kissing and will promptly remove them from the room if it appears on screen. Out the room? Is your homophobia so intense that merely changing the channel won't do the trick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PappyTron Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 Lol, another special atmosphere at AnFAILED today. If they can't get up for that they what can they get up for. Answer? Certainly not work.IShouldn't you be more concerned about your relegation scrap and £1 Billion debt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris1989 Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 Aww, sweet that you're still getting riled up. You know that we never discussed Chelsea beating Liverpool and Gerrard's slip because that was the last day you were online. It's alright, we showed how to win the league the next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 (edited) Don't know. It is full of homosexuals kissing before the watershed.Since when was kissing before the watershed disallowed? Every soap has to have the proper quota of 'gays'. I almost think you're being serious...Although I don't agree with Daisy on almost anything. He does have a point. On the quota for British "soaps" part at least.There was a point a few years ago where every other character introduced to those kind of shows was either gay, lesbian, transgender, or a victim of child abuse. I think it was Coronation Street which at one point had almost quarter of it's characters fall under those stereotypes. Now diversity is always important, but so is moderation and being "proportionate". I do though remember when Brookside moved to the later time slot after the ratings plummeted. I specifically remember Max borderline fingering Jacqui though (while flicking the channel). Who'd have thought it'd be cancelled soon after?Anyway it's all trash TV and this probably isn't a football related discussion .So, they kinda went from decades of not acknowledging that homosexuality exists at all to an unrealistically high level of representation as an unsophisticated effort at compensating? I guess it's all plot devices in a fairly trashy fictional narrative anyway, I doubt the writers are concerned with analysing demographic data to ensure that their number of homosexual characters is reflective of the societal reality.I was more baffled by the Dark-Ages-esque idea that homosexual kissing in particular should be after the watershed, as though it's more of an obscenity than heterosexual kissing...Call me ''something from the dark ages'' or a ''bigot'' but I do not want my nephews to be exposed to homosexual kissing and will promptly remove them from the room if it appears on screen. Out the room? Is your homophobia so intense that merely changing the channel won't do the trick? No cuz they have to know they've done something wrong by looking at it, if you quickly fumble the channel over it looks like you're the one thats done something wrong. I suppose you'd have to tell em too, the reason why, for casting eye on the queers. But then if seeing it in the living room is out of order then where does that leave talking about it? And you don't wanna send them out of the room without them knowing why, they might think it's like one of lifes forfeits, like everytime you see gayness on the telly you and your male cousin get sent out of the room to engage in some as a punishment Edited January 18, 2016 by Len B'stard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 Wanathan Woss wust we wuckin way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 Does anyone know a good site for streaming games on an iPad need to cut costs at home so sacking Sky in and using Putlocker for Movies/TV and used navixsport at the weekend ... it was alright but cut out a few times Just listen to talksport it's better than watching the games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 Ian...you're a dick!' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 I completely disagree with the statement, Wrightey is a personal hero of mine, i just think its hilairious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PappyTron Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 Aww, sweet that you're still getting riled up. You know that we never discussed Chelsea beating Liverpool and Gerrard's slip because that was the last day you were online.It's alright, we showed how to win the league the next season.Riled up? No. I only get pissed off with you when you bring up Hillsborough and that's because you are flat out wrong in your statements and it's taking the piss out of a tragedy.Yes, I disappeared from the forum for over a year because Gerrard slipped. That's obviously the reason and not in the slightest bit coincidental, despite me having stated at the time that Liverpool wouldn't win the league.So, about that debt and relegation scrap... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris1989 Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 Neither exist. You're confusing United debt with ours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PappyTron Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 (edited) Neither exist. You're confusing United debt with ours.You don't even know your own club; Chelsea have a near £1 Billion debt obligation. Your relegation scrap doesn't exist? Might want to look at the table and have a listen to your manager.And, just for the record, I couldn't give a fig what you think of Liverpool, the club, Scousers etc. I ONLY get pissed off when you spew your BS with stuff like "The Scousers were drunk and charged the gates. They then went on a rampage and attacked the police and stole from the dead. Vermin". Edited January 18, 2016 by PappyTron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 There was rumours around about pissing on dead bodies and such, that just sounds made up, without knowing really about any details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts