axl666 Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/205/6/457 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Italian girl Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sprite Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 Cool. I was actually just wondering the other day if those 2 doctors put that song on their CV haha. I work in the admin side of healthcare and know some doctors who I talk music with. One told me he's friends with a doctor in Las Vegas and in the early 90s while on tour, Axl called a Las Vegas ER and asked for a doctor to come to the show in case something happened to his throat. He told me he paid him $15,000 and didn't do anything but sit backstage. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gracii Guns Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 10 hours ago, Sprite said: Cool. I was actually just wondering the other day if those 2 doctors put that song on their CV haha. I work in the admin side of healthcare and know some doctors who I talk music with. One told me he's friends with a doctor in Las Vegas and in the early 90s while on tour, Axl called a Las Vegas ER and asked for a doctor to come to the show in case something happened to his throat. He told me he paid him $15,000 and didn't do anything but sit backstage. That to me illustrates Axl's approach to Guns N' Roses well. He's a professional to a fault, where it are him alive on several occasions, when the stress would cause him to act unprofessionally (eg late showings, clashes with other members). CD was Axl's vision and the band was there to support his project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GibsonLP Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 Cool story. One of my favourite songs, and now appreciate it even more now that I realise it's so cleverly written Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MYWIFEMYLIFE Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 It's one of the best songs, and Slash is awesome there 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 The illuminati are working over time to plant viral evidence of Coma being in the set list. Stay vigilant people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caught_in_a_Coma Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 That song is amazing 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bono Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 On 3/25/2016 at 4:39 PM, Gracii Guns said: That to me illustrates Axl's approach to Guns N' Roses well. He's a professional to a fault, where it are him alive on several occasions, when the stress would cause him to act unprofessionally (eg late showings, clashes with other members). CD was Axl's vision and the band was there to support his project. Axl is a professional to a fault? Ummmmm. NO. He is NOT. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvH Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 Thanks for posting. Quite short and not very in depth for an academic article, though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulMonster Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 2 hours ago, EvH said: Thanks for posting. Quite short and not very in depth for an academic article, though. Yes, that little epistel has not been peer-reviewed. I have no idea why it was included in the journal in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john lennon Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 Nice little article, but it doesn't exactly mention anything we don't already know, does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
axl666 Posted March 27, 2016 Author Share Posted March 27, 2016 7 hours ago, EvH said: Thanks for posting. Quite short and not very in depth for an academic article, though. The thread title is a bit misleading. It's actually a short observation/letter rather than a full academic article. The take home for psychiatrists would be 'here's this song which structurally mirrors the stages of this experience, and the song writers went through something similar'. The article would only be in the journal to very briefly catch and entertain the psychiatrist's attention. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Broue Posted March 27, 2016 Share Posted March 27, 2016 (edited) 5 hours ago, SoulMonster said: Yes, that little epistel has not been peer-reviewed. I have no idea why it was included in the journal in the first place. yup Thw whole article is basically describing the song with words Nothing else There's zero scientific/academic thing in this "article" Edited March 27, 2016 by Strange Broue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts