Jump to content

Amber Heard divorces Johnny Depp


Recommended Posts

On 6/2/2016 at 4:35 PM, classicrawker said:

Damn he looks like shite these days..............He has been hanging with Keef too long............more than one person has gone down in flames trying to emulate the indestructible Mr. Richards.............:lol:

He was also in a band with Gibby Haynes of Butthole Surfers and Shane MacGowan of The Pogues, plus spent a lot of time with Hunter Thompson when he was making Fear and Loathing, and longtime friends with Marilyn Manson. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, wasted said:

Basically Brad and Johnny are Hollywood cokeheads. 

All of Hollywood are on the ching, you think they do those press junkets all bright eyed and smiling all day on Robinsons Orange Squash?

Edited by Len B'stard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DieselDaisy said:

Racist.

Where I live, ordering a Chinese takeaway is ''ordering a Chinky'' or going to a Chinese restaurant is ''going to the Chinkies''. 

I'm universally racist, i hate everyone :lol:.  And yes, that phrase almost belongs in a Geordie accent.

Edited by Len B'stard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Len B'stard said:

Apparently Captain Jack lawyers have got her by the short and fishies.

Nah. More likely her lawyers asked for the moon in their initial petition, so that all options were on the table, but thought the better of the money ask. From a legal perspective a weak argument ("I need money even though I'm a movie star too") can poison a strong one ("he's a violent drunk, keep him away"), so best not to commingle them. Plus from a PR perspective, the usual "she just wants his money and she'll say and do anything to get it" nonsense started popping up, and all she really wants is protecting. This is pretty standard legal strategy and makes all the sense in the world, no "short and fishies" necessary.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 years later...
21 hours ago, gnfnr2k said:

Amber was the abuser in that whole thing, all the evidence proved it 

As for the Fernando stuff, does she said she has evidence like texts of him doing all this stuff?

That must be why Depp lost the defamation case in England. Where the judge said "The great majority of alleged assaults of Ms. Heard by Mr. Depp have been proved to the civil standard." (link)

Conservative website The Daily Wire had spent between $35,000 and $47,000 on Facebook and Instagram advertisements to promote "misleading information about the trial" and "anti-Amber Heard propaganda". (link)

The whole thing was co-opted by a political movement, and if you think that politics don't taint the popular narrative you saw all over social media, IDK what to tell you.

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/depp-heard-trial-gamergate-amberturd-altright-b2088919.html

Edited by evilfacelessturtle
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, gnfnr2k said:

Dont make me destroy you on this, it wont end well for you.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

Okay, edgelord. It's obvious that you're part of that group driven by their agenda, since you're parroting all of their talking points word for word.

17 hours ago, gnfnr2k said:

The case in the UK was not against Depp, it was against the newspaper.

You're gonna have to take that up with Reuters, not me:

"Johnny Depp loses 'wife-beater' libel case"

Depp was suing the newspaper, He lost the suit. I spoke correctly, nice try though.

17 hours ago, gnfnr2k said:

The reason why Depp lost the case in the UK is because the paper was not proven to have printed something they thought was a lie.  The only one the paper could have lost that case is if they willing printed something they knew was not true.

Try reading the quote of the judge again:

"The great majority of alleged assaults of Ms. Heard by Mr. Depp have been proved to the civil standard."

Not "The paper was not proven to have knowingly lied about assaults"

You dont even know what you are talking about. Please get a clue before you embarrass yourself more on this.

17 hours ago, gnfnr2k said:

How many times does she have to be caught in a lie before you dont believe her? Pretty much everything she said was BS. In all those audio clips you could clearly see Amber was the aggressor. Even when Johnny tried to get away she would follow her and keep after him. That is not what someone does who is being abused but that is what the abuser does.

How many times does Johnny need to be caught in a lie? Your obsessive focus on only one side says everything. Any rational person observing the case without a bias can obviously see that both parties were engaging in wrongdoing. You've exposed your agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, evilfacelessturtle said:

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

Okay, edgelord. It's obvious that you're part of that group driven by their agenda, since you're parroting all of their talking points word for word.

You're gonna have to take that up with Reuters, not me:

"Johnny Depp loses 'wife-beater' libel case"

Depp was suing the newspaper, He lost the suit. I spoke correctly, nice try though.

Try reading the quote of the judge again:

"The great majority of alleged assaults of Ms. Heard by Mr. Depp have been proved to the civil standard."

Not "The paper was not proven to have knowingly lied about assaults"

You dont even know what you are talking about. Please get a clue before you embarrass yourself more on this.

How many times does Johnny need to be caught in a lie? Your obsessive focus on only one side says everything. Any rational person observing the case without a bias can obviously see that both parties were engaging in wrongdoing. You've exposed your agenda.

You dont even know how libel cases work it and shows.  All that showed was the paper did not knowing post information they know was false. They just proved they believe what Amber said, that does not mean what she was claiming was true.

And you act like Depp suing the newspaper is exactly the same kind of case that was Depp vs Heard and it wasnt, That is where you are lying. And everyone can see it.

I also love how you are taking out of context what the Judge said but that is typical for clowns like you who defend Amber when all the evidence shows she was the abuser. But sure ignore all of that.

 

Amber lied over and over again. She faked pictures, she claimed she was beaten up then the very next day all the pics taken of her had no bruises on her. She admitted to having a bruise kit where she would fake bruises.  Then when called out on it she talked about a make up kit that was not even around when she claimed it was.

 

 

What did JD lie about? Do tell.  The fact is he was consistent where as Amber is the one who kept changing her story and making up things.  Like the spilled wine, the story about the camper, how she claimed JD threw Kate Moss down stairs, how she claimed JD gave her bruises yet there were no bruises on her, and she even photoshopped pictures claiming some of them were different pictures when they were clearly hte same picture.

How Amber claimed she didnt Alert TMZ but in the depo said she did and caught her self  and tried to change the subject. She even admitted on the stand she knows how to leak things when she wants to.

Or her terrible acting on the stand where she could not even fake cry. Hell she would be fake crying on the stand, and JD would object about something and she would just stop all emotions like a director yelled CUT and she would act all normal, until her team questoned her again then it was back to her bad fake acting.

Everyone witness brought up, proved how Amber lied about everything.  

Lets not forget about the whole donation thing she kept lying about. She could not even tell the truth on something as simple as that. Or the TMZ video where she kept goading JD to get upset, where she was trying to act scared yet on the video you clearly see her smile at the end that she cut that part of that got send to TMZ.

Lets also not forget about Amber laughed at JD when she was abusing him, after he said he will tell everyone she is an abuser. She told him oh yeah Johnny tell the world


its funny how in all those audio clips we heard, igt was always Amber being the abuser, and JD trying to get away from her, yet Amber was always the one perusing him.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, gnfnr2k said:

You dont even know how libel cases work it and shows.  All that showed was the paper did not knowing post information they know was false. They just proved they believe what Amber said, that does not mean what she was claiming was true.

And you act like Depp suing the newspaper is exactly the same kind of case that was Depp vs Heard and it wasnt, That is where you are lying. And everyone can see it.

I also love how you are taking out of context what the Judge said but that is typical for clowns like you who defend Amber when all the evidence shows she was the abuser. But sure ignore all of that.

 

Amber lied over and over again. She faked pictures, she claimed she was beaten up then the very next day all the pics taken of her had no bruises on her. She admitted to having a bruise kit where she would fake bruises.  Then when called out on it she talked about a make up kit that was not even around when she claimed it was.

 

 

What did JD lie about? Do tell.  The fact is he was consistent where as Amber is the one who kept changing her story and making up things.  Like the spilled wine, the story about the camper, how she claimed JD threw Kate Moss down stairs, how she claimed JD gave her bruises yet there were no bruises on her, and she even photoshopped pictures claiming some of them were different pictures when they were clearly hte same picture.

How Amber claimed she didnt Alert TMZ but in the depo said she did and caught her self  and tried to change the subject. She even admitted on the stand she knows how to leak things when she wants to.

Or her terrible acting on the stand where she could not even fake cry. Hell she would be fake crying on the stand, and JD would object about something and she would just stop all emotions like a director yelled CUT and she would act all normal, until her team questoned her again then it was back to her bad fake acting.

Everyone witness brought up, proved how Amber lied about everything.  

Lets not forget about the whole donation thing she kept lying about. She could not even tell the truth on something as simple as that. Or the TMZ video where she kept goading JD to get upset, where she was trying to act scared yet on the video you clearly see her smile at the end that she cut that part of that got send to TMZ.

Lets also not forget about Amber laughed at JD when she was abusing him, after he said he will tell everyone she is an abuser. She told him oh yeah Johnny tell the world


its funny how in all those audio clips we heard, igt was always Amber being the abuser, and JD trying to get away from her, yet Amber was always the one perusing him.  

 

Johnny Depp literally raped her, and she was telling her therapist about her abuse years before they ever divorced. Including the rape. If you know so much about this case, you must be aware of the therapist notes where they document how they saw bruises on Ambers face during a meeting. 

The "fake" picture was a lie, just like everything else Johnny Depp said about Amber. Metadata shows that it was Depp who altered the photo so that Ambers bruises were not as visible. Bruises that her make-up artist testified that they had to cover with make-up whenever they were filming a movie.

Johnny Depp is a wifebeater, and the UK case found that he committed 12 out of the 14 named incidences of spousal abuse that the Daily Mail accused him of. The UK judge with actual domestic violence training and a lot of experience with abuse cases like this. In the US, the jury (made of random people with no DV training and who openly admitted to watching videos outside of court that biased them against Amber) was being influenced by tiktok videos made by gullible, knownothings like you who worship at the feet of a washed up actor who had spent his life assaulting people (not just his wife). In fact, he had an active case because he drunkenly strangled a person who was working with him on set.

Are you going to accuse that person of lying too, or do you reserve that honor just for women?

Edited by meadsoap
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, meadsoap said:

Johnny Depp literally raped her, and she was telling her therapist about her abuse years before they ever divorced. Including the rape. If you know so much about this case, you must be aware of the therapist notes where they document how they saw bruises on Ambers face during a meeting. 

The "fake" picture was a lie, just like everything else Johnny Depp said about Amber. Metadata shows that it was Depp who altered the photo so that Ambers bruises were not as visible. Bruises that her make-up artist testified that they had to cover with make-up whenever they were filming a movie.

Johnny Depp is a wifebeater, and the UK case found that he committed 12 out of the 14 named incidences of spousal abuse that the Daily Mail accused him of. In the US, the jury was being seated by tiktok videos made by gullible people like you who worship at the feet of a washed up actor who had spent his life assaulting people (not just his wife). In fact, he had an active case because he drunkenly strangled a person who was working with him on set. Are you going to accuse that person of lying too, or do you reserve that honor just for women?

She faked those therapists notes lol They were in her handwriting. LOL 

And speaking of those notes funny how she could not even get that info right of when it actually happened, she changed her story on those as well.  Also the way those notes were written were in story form and that is not how therapists writes their notes.  There is also a reason why her therapist was not called to the stand, bc Amber was lying about it.

The fake picture was not a lie.  The metadata didnt show it was Deppt who altered the photo. Why are you lying about this? You can't even be truthful.  This is why you cant be taken seriously. It was proven Amber was the one who altered the picture, they had the exact picture twice, and claimed it was two different pictures, from different times of day. It as the same picture. 

There is zero evidence JD is a wifebeat but all the evidence shows that Amber lied about it, and that she was the abuser. 

As for her having to cover up bruises for a movie, funny how the pictures from that same time period, shows she had no bruises and she was not wearing any make up in those pictures. So there you go lying once again. You sure do lie a lot about this stuff. Weird.

You keep showing how you ignore all the facts and evidence of this case.

I can keep destroying you on this if you want.

 

 

 

Edited by gnfnr2k
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, gnfnr2k said:

She faked those therapists notes lol They were in her handwriting. LOL 

And speaking of those notes funny how she could not even get that info right of when it actually happened, she changed her story on those as well.  Also the way those notes were written were in story form and that is not how therapists writes their notes.  There is also a reason why her therapist was not called to the stand, bc Amber was lying about it.

The fake picture was not a lie.  The metadata didnt show it was Deppt who altered the photo. Why are you lying about this? You can't even be truthful.  This is why you cant be taken seriously. It was proven Amber was the one who altered the picture, they had the exact picture twice, and claimed it was two different pictures, from different times of day. It as the same picture. 

There is zero evidence JD is a wifebeat but all the evidence shows that Amber lied about it, and that she was the abuser. 

You keep showing how you ignore all the facts and evidence of this case.

I can keep destroying you on this if you want.

As for her having to cover up bruises for a movie, funny how the pictures from that same time period, shows she had no bruises and she was not wearing any make up in those pictures. So there you go lying once again. You sure do lie a lot about this stuff. Weird.

 

 

None of the things I just said was wrong. The therapists notes were admitted in trial and the therapist testified, how do you think people know about all that? The make-up artist testified under oath. The metadata was admitted too. On the other hand, none of what you said comes from anywhere but Q-anon videos

So you're going to accuse the therapist of lying, the make-up artist of lying, actual photo evidence of lying, the well-experienced and trained judge of lying, and johnny Depp's maid who witnessed Amber getting the shit kicked out of her of lying...I guess everyone is out for Johnny, never mind his long history of violence against other people in his life. Everything is fake because the guy who regularly assaults his employees and coworkers could NEVER assault his wife, right? Lol.

Edited by meadsoap
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, meadsoap said:

So you're going to accuse the therapist of lying, the make-up artist of lying, actual photo evidence of lying, the well-experienced and trained judge of lying judge, and johnny Depp's maid who witnessed Amber getting the shit kicked out of her of lying...

I guess everyone is out for Johnny, never mind his long history of violence against other people in his life. Everything is fake because the guy who regularly beats his employees and coworkers could NEVER assault his wife, right? Lol.

The therapist did not testify. You are talking about the notes and the notes are in Ambers handwriting. Amber also changed her story about when these incidents happened from before and after the trial went on break. Amber could never get her stories straight. Where are all the pictures of Amber all bruised up? Oh right there are not any bc she is lying.  She claimed JD hit in her the fact yet there are on pictures of her face all messed up are there. And JD wears rings all the time, someone hits you on the fact with rings, make up is not covering it up.  She claims he beat the hell out of her back yet she is on TV the next night in a backless dress with no bruises 

Amber has all these claims of JD beating her with no evidence.  Yet we hear all of this evidence on video of Amber being the abuser. And Amber would contradict herself over and over again about these incidents. She could not even keep them straight. 

Also Amber hit her GF at the time in front of a cop so there is that.  And she is on all these audio tapes of her abusing JD but sure ignore that

Amber lie over and over again and had no evidence of her getting beat up by JD.  Every picture of her after so called incidents of abuse she had zero marks on her.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...