Dazey Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 I'm nursing a semi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 11 hours ago, Dazey said: I'm nursing a semi. She has a regional accent and British teeth, so she might stand a chance at appealing to the traditional heartlands. She is a remainer however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 13 hours ago, Dazey said: I'm nursing a semi. Shes looks a bit like Kathy Burke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 She looks like Jack Harper from On the Buses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted January 15, 2020 Share Posted January 15, 2020 Out of this dire bunch, I tend to think Jess Phillips is the best candidate really. Long ''Corbyn 10/10'' Bailey is wretched and Thornberry is an utterly horrendous sack of steaming fecal matter. Starmer seems too much the Blairy EU luvvie posh wanker, whilst Nandy is a bit of a nonentity. I'd go Phillips, Nandy, Starmer, Wrong-Bailey and Thornberry in that order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontdamnmeuyi2015 Posted January 15, 2020 Share Posted January 15, 2020 Back in the 40's when a royal married a divorced American woman, he was out! Thank goodness things have changed. lol I say Harry and Megan should do what they feel is right for their family, but Megan should have realized how much her life would change being in the royal family and having certain duties that you are supposed to do. I hope the Queen lives for her retirement and has some peace in her last days. Charles will be King and the family will go on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted January 15, 2020 Share Posted January 15, 2020 2 hours ago, dontdamnmeuyi2015 said: Back in the 40's when a royal married a divorced American woman, he was out! Thank goodness things have changed. lol I say Harry and Megan should do what they feel is right for their family, but Megan should have realized how much her life would change being in the royal family and having certain duties that you are supposed to do. I hope the Queen lives for her retirement and has some peace in her last days. Charles will be King and the family will go on. 1936. The 1936 Abdication Crisis. The big difference is that Edward VIII was the King-Emperor at the time of the Abdication Crisis whereas Harry is only sixth in line to the throne. But yes, there are some superficial similarities, American divorcee and so forth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spunko12345 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 3 hours ago, dontdamnmeuyi2015 said: Back in the 40's when a royal married a divorced American woman, he was out! Thank goodness things have changed. lol I say Harry and Megan should do what they feel is right for their family, but Megan should have realized how much her life would change being in the royal family and having certain duties that you are supposed to do. I hope the Queen lives for her retirement and has some peace in her last days. Charles will be King and the family will go on. Don't fall into the trap of thinking being a royal is hard work. Basically it's like winning the lottery but forgetting to tick the "no publicity "box. I feel like I personally own them all and if Harry wants to leave he has to pay me back all the money the cocky ginger twat. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Padme Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 11 hours ago, DieselDaisy said: 1936. The 1936 Abdication Crisis. The big difference is that Edward VIII was the King-Emperor at the time of the Abdication Crisis whereas Harry is only sixth in line to the throne. But yes, there are some superficial similarities, American divorcee and so forth. I'm not so sure Wallis Simpson was the main reason behind the abdication. There were other issues with King Edward Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Just now, Padme said: I'm not so sure Wallis Simpson was the main reason behind the abdication. There were other issues with King Edward He was a poof? Or a nazi? Or a nazi poof? Am I close? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Padme Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 10 minutes ago, Len Cnut said: He was a poof? Or a nazi? Or a nazi poof? Am I close? Yeah, at the time he liked Hitler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Just now, Padme said: Yeah, at the time he liked Hitler I knew one of em had nazi rumours but I couldn't remember if it was him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 (edited) The Abdication Crisis had nothing to do with any suggestion of fascist sympathies, which anyhow transpired, at least publically, after the abdication - the famous meeting at the Berghof occurred October 1937. Edited January 16, 2020 by DieselDaisy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Padme Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 13 minutes ago, DieselDaisy said: The Abdication Crisis had nothing to do with any suggestion of fascist sympathies, which anyhow transpired, at least publically, after the abdication - the famous meeting at the Berghof occurred October 1937. That picture shows Edward had a friendship or at the very least admiration for Hitler. Hard to believe the abdication had nothing to with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 1 minute ago, Padme said: That picture shows Edward had a friendship or at the very least admiration for Hitler. Hard to believe the abdication had nothing to with it. That meeting was after the abdication, as the Duke and Duchess of Windsor! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulMonster Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 It is all very nicely explained in The Crown on Netflix. But I would rather recommend The Boys on Amazon Prime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 7 minutes ago, SoulMonster said: It is all very nicely explained in The Crown on Netflix. But I would rather recommend The Leather Boys on gaypornhub.com. Fixed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Padme Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 13 minutes ago, DieselDaisy said: That meeting was after the abdication, as the Duke and Duchess of Windsor! And years before the abdication... https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/18/royal-family-archives-queen-nazi-salute Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 2 hours ago, Padme said: And years before the abdication... https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/18/royal-family-archives-queen-nazi-salute So what are you saying; that despite records of contemporary Westminster constitutional debate and proceedings, royal correspondence and (world) media coverage; that despite a multitude of historiography; the Abdication Crisis of 1936 was not about something everyone else thought it was, but in fact was something else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basic_GnR_Fan Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 16 minutes ago, DieselDaisy said: So what are you saying; that despite records of contemporary Westminster constitutional debate and proceedings, royal correspondence and (world) media coverage; that despite a multitude of historiography; the Abdication Crisis of 1936 was not about something everyone else thought it was, but in fact was something else? It's amazing how people can have such strong beliefs about a topic yet not be able to provide a single primary document or piece of evidence as a source for that belief. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazey Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 59 minutes ago, DieselDaisy said: So what are you saying; that despite records of contemporary Westminster constitutional debate and proceedings, royal correspondence and (world) media coverage; that despite a multitude of historiography; the Abdication Crisis of 1936 was not about something everyone else thought it was, but in fact was something else? It's almost as if he's adopted your method of argument against climate change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselDaisy Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 5 minutes ago, Dazey said: It's almost as if he's adopted your method of argument against climate change. I don't believe I have a method of argument against climate change, except to take the piss out of the whole hysteria. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 25 minutes ago, Dazey said: It's almost as if he's adopted your method of argument against climate change. Padmes a bird ain't she? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulMonster Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 32 minutes ago, Len Cnut said: Padmes a bird ain't she? You are absolutely fixated on birds! This swan fetish is completely bonkers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Cnut Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 (edited) 21 minutes ago, SoulMonster said: You are absolutely fixated on birds! This swan fetish is completely bonkers. I meant an opposite member of the contradictory gender young man. Adams rib. The other side. One of them. a woMAN, a feMALE. Edited January 16, 2020 by Len Cnut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.