OmarBradley Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 There is absolutely nothing wrong with pointing out the naivety/stupidity of a celebrity putting this kind of content within reach of hackers. None.They are massive targets for this kind of thing and if they have any kind of public profile at all they know this, as do their advisers/managers.Yet, I bet this won't be the last celebrity who gets hacked and has this kind of content released to the public. Despite the huge publicity surrounding this.And the media of course is rife with hypocrisy in its coverage of this story. According to one braindead cunt at Forbes this is now "a sex crime." It is an interesting position for anyone in the media to take as it raises all kinds of questions about the media itself. 1) Does that make paparazzi, who use long lenses to take photos of celebrities sunbathing topless in private, become rapists?2) Are the magazines/websites/tv shows who pay said paparazzi co-conspirators in said rape of that celebrity?3) Are the consumers of the above also conspirators?4) Are the likes of Piers Morgan,Andy Coulson, and others involved in the hacking of celebrities/politicians phones now considered "mind rapists"?5) How does a court of law define the parameters of "mind rape"?6) Will ogling a person on the street now be considered "mind rape"?7) Does this mean that Coca Cola advocates "mind rape" with their Diet Coke ads? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan H. Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 There is absolutely nothing wrong with pointing out the naivety/stupidity of a celebrity putting this kind of content within reach of hackers. None.They are massive targets for this kind of thing and if they have any kind of public profile at all they know this, as do their advisers/managers.Yet, I bet this won't be the last celebrity who gets hacked and has this kind of content released to the public. Despite the huge publicity surrounding this.And the media of course is rife with hypocrisy in its coverage of this story. According to one braindead cunt at Forbes this is now "a sex crime." It is an interesting position for anyone in the media to take as it raises all kinds of questions about the media itself. 1) Does that make paparazzi, who use long lenses to take photos of celebrities sunbathing topless in private, become rapists?2) Are the magazines/websites/tv shows who pay said paparazzi co-conspirators in said rape of that celebrity?3) Are the consumers of the above also conspirators?4) Are the likes of Piers Morgan,Andy Coulson, and others involved in the hacking of celebrities/politicians phones now considered "mind rapists"?5) How does a court of law define the parameters of "mind rape"?6) Will ogling a person on the street now be considered "mind rape"?7) Does this mean that Coca Cola advocates "mind rape" with their Diet Coke ads? Damn, I've never seen so much crazy in one place in a very long time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facekicker Posted September 2, 2014 Author Share Posted September 2, 2014 I don't actually believe any of that shit you clowns Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan H. Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Phew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bran Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 (edited) I don't actually believe any of that shit you clowns sad part from posts around the net some people do Edited September 2, 2014 by bran Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosaj Thing Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 I will register a personal account on Twitter to crush these self-righteous little shits. Honestly, people think they deserve any kind of special treatment because... they're celebrities. It's bad that happened, it ain't my fault, though.Don't want your shit on the internet, don't upload it.How is it self-righteous and wanting special treatment to not want your private photos to be hacked into and released? What part of that is supposed to be some special privilege?Did you read the attention-seeking tweet of Patricia Arquette? It is the context, lady. The context.It's cool to have a voice in something that should not happen, like this. But, let's be honest, 80% of people tweeting or discussing this topic couldn't care less about it, it's just a good opportunity for self-exposure and free publicity. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facekicker Posted September 2, 2014 Author Share Posted September 2, 2014 I don't actually believe any of that shit you clowns sad part from posts around the net some people do Yeah that is the scary thing. People like the attention whore Lena Dunham have come out with this kind of nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosaj Thing Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 I don't actually believe any of that shit you clowns sad part from posts around the net some people do Yeah that is the scary thing. People like the attention whore Lena Dunham have come out with this kind of nonsense. It's just fuckin' hilarious. It's like this is something new that never happened before. Fuck these attention whores. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunsguy Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussTCB Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facekicker Posted September 2, 2014 Author Share Posted September 2, 2014 I don't actually believe any of that shit you clowns sad part from posts around the net some people do Yeah that is the scary thing. People like the attention whore Lena Dunham have come out with this kind of nonsense. It's just fuckin' hilarious. It's like this is something new that never happened before. Fuck these attention whores.It really is drawing the fucking morons out of the woodwork. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysteron Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Bar Rafaeli, DiCaprio's supermodel ex probably has the filthiest one - bent over, ass to the camera, pulling her cheeks open - pure filth lolThere's two of Jennifer Lawrence after some bastard shot his load all over her face.Oscar worthy.Facekicker will be coming soon It's odd how so many people record themselves this way, and allow themselves to be put in such a position, no pun intended Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Moon Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 if you want to see my cock just pm me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axl_morris Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Who was the person with a cock in her eye. That one was hilarious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysteron Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 if you want to see my cock just pm meYou farmers like to show off your prize birds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosaj Thing Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Who was the person with a cock in her eye. That one was hilarious.That was Jessica Brown Findlay. Yeah, I laughed really hard when I saw those pictures.She also looks sad, like "this dick defeated me". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
***Flawless Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 (edited) Did you read the attention-seeking tweet of Patricia Arquette? It is the context, lady. The context.It's cool to have a voice in something that should not happen, like this. But, let's be honest, 80% of people tweeting or discussing this topic couldn't care less about it, it's just a good opportunity for self-exposure and free publicity.Yes I did and I don't see a problem with it? It's not attention-seeking, it's making a point concerning the nature of these hacked and leaked pictures. It may not be direct abuse, but it lends to the idea that men are entitled to any female body that want to see, and that is dangerous.The fact that someone hacked to get these otherwise unattainable images of these female celebrities, shows a desperate sense of entitlement and is disgusting. Edited September 2, 2014 by ***Flawless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosaj Thing Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Did you read the attention-seeking tweet of Patricia Arquette? It is the context, lady. The context.It's cool to have a voice in something that should not happen, like this. But, let's be honest, 80% of people tweeting or discussing this topic couldn't care less about it, it's just a good opportunity for self-exposure and free publicity.Yes I did and I don't see a problem with it? It's not attention-seeking, it's making a point concerning the nature of these hacked and leaked pictures. It may not be direct abuse, but it lends to the idea that men are entitled to any female body that want to see, and that is dangerous.The fact that someone hacked to get these otherwise unattainable images of these female celebrities, shows a desperate sense of entitlement and is disgusting.But she never addressed the hackers, just the people seeing the pictures.It was a stupid point being made that only shows how ignorant some people are but hey, if you agree with that statement, there's nothing else I can say to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facekicker Posted September 2, 2014 Author Share Posted September 2, 2014 Did you read the attention-seeking tweet of Patricia Arquette? It is the context, lady. The context.It's cool to have a voice in something that should not happen, like this. But, let's be honest, 80% of people tweeting or discussing this topic couldn't care less about it, it's just a good opportunity for self-exposure and free publicity.Yes I did and I don't see a problem with it? It's not attention-seeking, it's making a point concerning the nature of these hacked and leaked pictures. It may not be direct abuse, but it lends to the idea that men are entitled to any female body that want to see, and that is dangerous.The fact that someone hacked to get these otherwise unattainable images of these female celebrities, shows a desperate sense of entitlement and is disgusting.She made a point alright, a stupid one. Watch out, it's contagious. As for your complete omission of the male celebrities involved I can only conclude you don't give a fuck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
***Flawless Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 But she never addressed the hackers, just the people seeing the pictures.It was a stupid point being made that only shows how ignorant some people are but hey, if you agree with that statement, there's nothing else I can say to you. It's not molestation, that was a stupid word to use; but people are looking at naked images of women, of which these women didn't want people to see. Anyone should be able to look at that objectively and say it's wrong. It shows a bigger problem that people are so willing to disrespect someone's privacy by viewing stolen images of these women, than to view photos/videos of women that willingly put those files on the internet.You have a lot of people paying for and eagerly awaiting someone to release illegally obtained images of people when they're naked, that is a serious problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batman007 Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Was Mckayla 18 in the photos? If not ,I care not to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
***Flawless Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Was Mckayla 18 in the photos? If not ,I care not to see.A few of the 'women' are suspected to have been underaged in their images, including her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forsaken Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Was Mckayla 18 in the photos? If not ,I care not to see.Under 18 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coma16 Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Sad that there is a bigger uproar about these than people getting their heads chopped off in the Middle East or that the terror threat level in the UK has been increased to 'severe'... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Moon Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 if you want to see my cock just pm meYou farmers like to show off your prize birdsi've never farmed anything.except orsys love for me. i'm growing that like my penis when i think of her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.