iCloud hacked - celebs nude pics flood the internet - J-Law, Kate Upton etc

[username]

Was Mckayla 18 in the photos? If not ,I care not to see.

Under 18

16's legal here.

Same here. But if it wasn't, I'd still look at them and love it.

disclaimer:

j/k mr. policeman. I totally wouldn't. That would be wrong.

[Dazey]

Was Mckayla 18 in the photos? If not ,I care not to see.

Under 18

16's legal here.

Same here. But if it wasn't, I'd still look at them and love it.

disclaimer:

j/k mr. policeman. I totally wouldn't. That would be wrong.

Hey, if they're younger than 16 then I'd just move to Spain.

*hides*

[Conor]

Was Mckayla 18 in the photos? If not ,I care not to see.

Under 18

16's legal here.

Same here. But if it wasn't, I'd still look at them and love it.

disclaimer:

j/k mr. policeman. I totally wouldn't. That would be wrong.

Hey, if they're younger than 16 then I'd just move to Spain.

*hides*

Isn't it 16 is legal for sex, but there's some silly law that pictures has to be 18+?

[Broskirose]

People who play the moral highground as if they're incapable of being aroused by 17 year old, 364 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes and 59 second year old tits but then magically GET TURNED THE FUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK ON a second later are douches.

Just keep it reasonable. Weren't 16 year olds allowed to be photographed topless in the UK until the early 2000s or something like that?

[Bobbo]

I love how Mckayla is stubbornly denying the pictures are authentic, but is fighting tooth and nail to have them taken down because if they were real, she was underage. Wtf?

And that goes for you too grande or whatever the shit your name is. Nothing beats Victoria Justice's hand in the cookie jar tweets though.

[Rovim]

People who play the moral highground as if they're incapable of being aroused by 17 year old, 364 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes and 59 second year old tits but then magically GET TURNED THE FUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK ON a second later are douches.

Just keep it reasonable. Weren't 16 year olds allowed to be photographed topless in the UK until the early 2000s or something like that?

Yeah, it's not like men can control what turns them on. I'll never fuck a 17 year old, but it's so hypocrite to say: "nope! nothing, no movement down there, no matter how hot she is if she's under 18." that's fuckin' stupid.

[Bobbo]

Actually, if I was one of these broads, I'd be pissed too.

I've gotten better nudes from random bar whores.

Airbrushing and photoshop really are a hell of a mirage.

[Georgy Zhukov]

I've gotten better nudes from random bar whores.

I'm sure you have.

[alfierose]

Why is an underage girl taking nude pics of herself to begin with? Who did she send them to?

Oh yeah, not her fault ... once again, a man must have forced her to do it.

Blame everyone except her, she's a victim.

Underage people are children, boys or girls. It's why laws are in place to protect them, they are victims because their developing brains and limited experience of the world lead them to make unwise decisions. If we don't afford them protection then they become even more vulnerable to exploitation.

[***Flawless]

Nice that child pornography isn't a big deal to some people, how disgusting.

Why is an underage girl taking nude pics of herself to begin with? Who did she send them to?

Oh yeah, not her fault ... once again, a man must have forced her to do it.

Blame everyone except her, she's a victim.

Yes, she is the victim. You trying to turn the theft of this girl's picture (as it stands, child pornography) as a way to blame the girl in them for it's release (and subsequent enjoyment of it by perverts) is gross.

[Facekicker]

Because of course, all the people looking at these photos are men

[***Flawless]

Did I say that? I said perverts, if you automatically associate that with men then that's on you.

[downzy]

Where one falls on this issue really depends on how you view the act itself and whether implied risk is involved. If you truly believe that taking naked selfies or shots of sex acts in this digital age are acts with no inherent risks, then I can understand the outrage about them being leaked/hacked.

But I view these types of acts much like someone bungie jumping or sky diving. Sure, nothing should go wrong, but once in awhile something does. There are risks involved. In fact, I'd argue that the risks are part of the turn on, that the thought of being caught or exposed is part of the reason why people engage in these types of endeavours. Someone dies as a result of jumping out of a plane, I'll feel bad, but not as bad someone who is pushed out of plane. The person skydiving knew the risks. It's tragic, but it's not as though the person committing the act didn't understand that a result of the act they could become human pancakes.

Hence, it's a little difficult for me to feel the level of sympathy for these women that many media commentators want me to feel. I think Ricky Gervais was bang on in his initial (and later redacted) assessment. Understand the risk involved with these sort of situations. Others have likened this to using your credit card on the Internet, and that if you become a victim of theft or fraud as a result you only have yourself to blame. Again, this is a ridiculously over-simplistic assessment. I would hope that everyone knows the risks of using electronic commerce. I'm not suggesting that it was the fault of the person who got ripped off is at fault, but if they truly wanted to minimize their risk they could have sent a bank money order.

Of course, what has happened to women like Jennifer Lawrence and Kate Upton is not in anyway like what happened to Erin Andrews, who was video taped nude unbeknown to her. These two incidents should not be confused, which is unfortunately happening a lot in the media.

[ColdHeartBreaker]

I think they look ridiculous posing in front of their Iphones doing a sexy pose.

The sexualisation of a young girls is concerning. Wonder how younger girls will see this?

Edited September 3, 2014 by ColdHeartBreaker

[Georgy Zhukov]

I think they look ridiculous posing in front of their Iphones doing a sexy pose.

It really shows how talented the photographers are. They deserve more credit.

[ColdHeartBreaker]

Do all girls do this?

[Jakey Styley]

Do some of you men, upon receiving a risque picture from a girl, think "Are you serious? How irresponsible and stupid!"

[Georgy Zhukov]

Nude pics are insurance policies for ex's

I think they look ridiculous posing in front of their Iphones doing a sexy pose.

The sexualisation of a young girls is concerning. Wonder how younger girls will see this?

They will say "That is so hot, I want to do the same thing! Oh wait. I already do!"

Edited September 3, 2014 by Georgy Zhukov

[downzy]

Do some of you men, upon receiving a risque picture from a girl, think "Are you serious? How irresponsible and stupid!"

Close. It's usually, "Awesome! How irresponsible and stupid!"

[***Flawless]

I think they look ridiculous posing in front of their Iphones doing a sexy pose.

I'm sure the people these pictures were actually intended for didn't think so.

[Facekicker]

Where one falls on this issue really depends on how you view the act itself and whether implied risk is involved. If you truly believe that taking naked selfies or shots of sex acts in this digital age are acts with no inherent risks, then I can understand the outrage about them being leaked/hacked.

But I view these types of acts much like someone bungie jumping or sky diving. Sure, nothing should go wrong, but once in awhile something does. There are risks involved. In fact, I'd argue that the risks are part of the turn on, that the thought of being caught or exposed is part of the reason why people engage in these types of endeavours. Someone dies as a result of jumping out of a plane, I'll feel bad, but not as bad someone who is pushed out of plane. The person skydiving knew the risks. It's tragic, but it's not as though the person committing the act didn't understand that a result of the act they could become human pancakes.

Hence, it's a little difficult for me to feel the level of sympathy for these women that many media commentators want me to feel. I think Ricky Gervais was bang on in his initial (and later redacted) assessment. Understand the risk involved with these sort of situations. Others have likened this to using your credit card on the Internet, and that if you become a victim of theft or fraud as a result you only have yourself to blame. Again, this is a ridiculously over-simplistic assessment. I would hope that everyone knows the risks of using electronic commerce. I'm not suggesting that it was the fault of the person who got ripped off is at fault, but if they truly wanted to minimize their risk they could have sent a bank money order.

Of course, what has happened to women like Jennifer Lawrence and Kate Upton is not in anyway like what happened to Erin Andrews, who was video taped nude unbeknown to her. These two incidents should not be confused, which is unfortunately happening a lot in the media.

Well said but I don't expect any sensible analysis in the media regarding this. The shrill faux outrage on the likes of the Huffington Post from white knights and bitter feminists is kind of hilarious considering the articles are besides the likes of these

Huffingtonpost article links directly to nude photos of Greg Oden

Victoria Secret Model Sunbathes Topless

Celebrity Nip Slips

[downzy]

Where one falls on this issue really depends on how you view the act itself and whether implied risk is involved. If you truly believe that taking naked selfies or shots of sex acts in this digital age are acts with no inherent risks, then I can understand the outrage about them being leaked/hacked.

But I view these types of acts much like someone bungie jumping or sky diving. Sure, nothing should go wrong, but once in awhile something does. There are risks involved. In fact, I'd argue that the risks are part of the turn on, that the thought of being caught or exposed is part of the reason why people engage in these types of endeavours. Someone dies as a result of jumping out of a plane, I'll feel bad, but not as bad someone who is pushed out of plane. The person skydiving knew the risks. It's tragic, but it's not as though the person committing the act didn't understand that a result of the act they could become human pancakes.

Hence, it's a little difficult for me to feel the level of sympathy for these women that many media commentators want me to feel. I think Ricky Gervais was bang on in his initial (and later redacted) assessment. Understand the risk involved with these sort of situations. Others have likened this to using your credit card on the Internet, and that if you become a victim of theft or fraud as a result you only have yourself to blame. Again, this is a ridiculously over-simplistic assessment. I would hope that everyone knows the risks of using electronic commerce. I'm not suggesting that it was the fault of the person who got ripped off is at fault, but if they truly wanted to minimize their risk they could have sent a bank money order.

Of course, what has happened to women like Jennifer Lawrence and Kate Upton is not in anyway like what happened to Erin Andrews, who was video taped nude unbeknown to her. These two incidents should not be confused, which is unfortunately happening a lot in the media.

Well said but I don't expect any sensible analysis in the media regarding this. The shrill faux outrage on the likes of the Huffington Post from white knights and bitter feminists is kind of hilarious considering the articles are besides the likes of these

Huffingtonpost article links directly to nude photos of Greg Oden

Victoria Secret Model Sunbathes Topless

Celebrity Nip Slips

It's not a feminist issue, in my opinion. Sure, women are generally the usual targets of hackers and such, but there have been other male celebrities (Gene Simmons, Hulk Hogan, Fred Durst, etc.) who have had their dirty laundry exposed. It's a notion of common sense that extends beyond gender issues. All celebrities, whether male or female, are targets if they choose to store dirty pictures of themselves. Were one to ever leak, you don't think that Magisme wouldn't be the first one checking out an Axl Rose sex tape?

And great point on the Huffington Post. It is the very last publication that should be commenting on this. Everyday they have an article on nipslips, sideboob, and sex tapes. It's ridiculous that they'd now come down hard on the very thing that they so often perpetuate.

Edited September 3, 2014 by downzy

[Facekicker]

Where one falls on this issue really depends on how you view the act itself and whether implied risk is involved. If you truly believe that taking naked selfies or shots of sex acts in this digital age are acts with no inherent risks, then I can understand the outrage about them being leaked/hacked.

But I view these types of acts much like someone bungie jumping or sky diving. Sure, nothing should go wrong, but once in awhile something does. There are risks involved. In fact, I'd argue that the risks are part of the turn on, that the thought of being caught or exposed is part of the reason why people engage in these types of endeavours. Someone dies as a result of jumping out of a plane, I'll feel bad, but not as bad someone who is pushed out of plane. The person skydiving knew the risks. It's tragic, but it's not as though the person committing the act didn't understand that a result of the act they could become human pancakes.

Hence, it's a little difficult for me to feel the level of sympathy for these women that many media commentators want me to feel. I think Ricky Gervais was bang on in his initial (and later redacted) assessment. Understand the risk involved with these sort of situations. Others have likened this to using your credit card on the Internet, and that if you become a victim of theft or fraud as a result you only have yourself to blame. Again, this is a ridiculously over-simplistic assessment. I would hope that everyone knows the risks of using electronic commerce. I'm not suggesting that it was the fault of the person who got ripped off is at fault, but if they truly wanted to minimize their risk they could have sent a bank money order.

Of course, what has happened to women like Jennifer Lawrence and Kate Upton is not in anyway like what happened to Erin Andrews, who was video taped nude unbeknown to her. These two incidents should not be confused, which is unfortunately happening a lot in the media.

Well said but I don't expect any sensible analysis in the media regarding this. The shrill faux outrage on the likes of the Huffington Post from white knights and bitter feminists is kind of hilarious considering the articles are besides the likes of these

Huffingtonpost article links directly to nude photos of Greg Oden

Victoria Secret Model Sunbathes Topless

Celebrity Nip Slips

It's not a feminist issue, in my opinion. Sure, women are generally the usual targets of hackers and such, but there have been other male celebrities (Gene Simmons, Hulk Hogan, Fred Durst, etc.) who have had their dirty laundry exposed. It's a notion of common sense that extends beyond gender issues. All celebrities, whether male or female, are targets if they choose to store dirty pictures of themselves. Were one to ever leak, you don't think that Magisme wouldn't be the first one checking out an Axl Rose sex tape?

And great point on the Huffington Post. It is the very last publication that should be commenting on this. Everyday they have an article on nipslips, sideboob, and sex tapes. It's ridiculous that they'd now come down hard on the very thing that they so often perpetuate.

The Feminists are the most vocal though. Any opportunity to have a go at men and try to link it to "rape culture". *

*Not all feminists but the radical nuts seem to get platforms like HuffPo with ease.

[Ace Nova]

I was somewhat hesitant to really look at these but I came across them reading Redditt this morning.

I actually feel sorry for Jennifer Lawrence. I doubt she even knew those pics were floating around (at least the facial ones). There's tons of assholes out there that pride themselves in taking pics when the chick is at her most vulnerable....she was probably wasted on top of it. But hey, she's also to blame....she just f'ed the wrong asshole.

Edited September 3, 2014 by Kasanova King

[Coma16]

I was somewhat hesitant to really look at these but I came across them reading Redditt this morning.

I actually feel sorry for Jennifer Lawrence. I doubt she even knew those pics were floating around (at least the facial ones). There's tons off assholes out there that pride themselves in taking pics when the chick is at her most vulnerable....she was probably wasted on top of it. But hey, she's also to blame....she just f'ed the wrong asshole.

There were too many of her to pass the blame of taking them to someone else - alcohol is never an excuse either. Why was the person who took them an asshole? Did he leak the photos? How do you it didn't turn her on? I thought her iCloud was hacked.