Figueredo Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 That is not the reason for the current delay as far as I know. Yeah, I'm under that impression as well. Last I heard from Rock Fuel, the publishing issue had been resolved. I'd just been wondering the whole time what the publishing issue was in the first place. A problem with one of the cover songs? It hadn't occurred to me it might be an issue with the classic GNR songs. According to someone I spoke with the other day, Slash and Duff were holding things up, but if Rock Fuel is to be believed (and I personally believe them), that's been resolved.No idea what the current delay is.Just give $la$h some money and he'll approve itAnd Axl is releasing (LOL) this DVD for what? world peace? HAHAHAHA 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NGOG Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 That type of mentality rings of Team Brazil apologism. At the end of the day, Rock Fuel have already released multiple DVDs. One of those DVDs featured a performance by The Smashing Pumpkins (who themselves have endured changing line-ups).There is a basic protocol when it comes to due royalties; why are GNR the only entity that seemingly 'suffer' from it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Padme Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 Duff and Slash are very active on twitter. So those who have twitter accounts try ask them about it. If they don´t answer take that as a confirmation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfierose Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 Isn't PC mostly user led content though? If it works a bit like twitter or Facebook then it would be too problematic to censor Slash stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coma16 Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 Why would Duff compromise his good relations with Axl by passively resisting a new GNR DVD?Don't forget, this is a version of GNR Duff's band has opened for.It's all about the benjamins baby. I'm sure once they agree to a sum (which it sounds like they have) they'd sign off on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amir Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 That type of mentality rings of Team Brazil apologism. At the end of the day, Rock Fuel have already released multiple DVDs. One of those DVDs featured a performance by The Smashing Pumpkins (who themselves have endured changing line-ups).There is a basic protocol when it comes to due royalties; why are GNR the only entity that seemingly 'suffer' from it?Are they trying to prevent Slash and Duff from claiming royalties? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfierose Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 I think this is the first official dvd release of the nuband so it's probably new territory as far as royalties go and a win win situation for the lawyers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon Comstock Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 I think this is the first official dvd release of the nuband so it's probably new territory as far as royalties go and a win win situation for the lawyers.There have been other DVDs that were supposed to come out, but never did. This one's had the most promo, but until it's actually on a shelf in front of you, don't assume minor details that normal bands work thru can just be ironed out with this band... I can think of at least 2 other DVDs that something should've been done with, not including the 01 Vegas gig (which Axl denies was intended for release or that in went to production). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downzy Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 Anyone want to wager the over/under page count for this thread relative to an actual release of this product? It stands at 50 now, so I'm going to guess the over-under at 105 pages. Will this thread add 55 more pages of posts before the disc gets released? Maybe it should be a 150 (but I can't see people still being interested by 120)? Anyway, thought it amusing that we're 50 pages into this thread and still no release date. I'm sure this bodes very well for the next album 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfierose Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 95 <optimistic> what do we win? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
axlsalinger Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 51. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NGOG Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 That type of mentality rings of Team Brazil apologism. At the end of the day, Rock Fuel have already released multiple DVDs. One of those DVDs featured a performance by The Smashing Pumpkins (who themselves have endured changing line-ups).There is a basic protocol when it comes to due royalties; why are GNR the only entity that seemingly 'suffer' from it?Are they trying to prevent Slash and Duff from claiming royalties?I never claimed that.Nor have I claimed Fernando is "to blame". I heard he was perceived as being unsupportive by Rock Fuel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downzy Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 95 <optimistic> what do we win?The right to tell everyone I told you so! (Though if I worked for Rockfuel, I would offer up a free copy to any mygnrforum member who guesses the correct number - good form of promotion imo).It would be funny if the "official" Nightrain forum did something like this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bards Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 That type of mentality rings of Team Brazil apologism. At the end of the day, Rock Fuel have already released multiple DVDs. One of those DVDs featured a performance by The Smashing Pumpkins (who themselves have endured changing line-ups).There is a basic protocol when it comes to due royalties; why are GNR the only entity that seemingly 'suffer' from it?Are they trying to prevent Slash and Duff from claiming royalties?I never claimed that.Nor have I claimed Fernando is "to blame". I heard he was perceived as being unsupportive by Rock Fuel.You have an incredibly annoying habit of saying "i never said that" when someone asks you a follow-up question to something you said. If you want to talk like a pseudo-insider than just answer the inevitable follow-up q's when you say something. You will come off half as douchey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Bonham Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 Anyone want to wager the over/under page count for this thread relative to an actual release of this product? It stands at 50 now, so I'm going to guess the over-under at 105 pages. Will this thread add 55 more pages of posts before the disc gets released? Maybe it should be a 150 (but I can't see people still being interested by 120)? Anyway, thought it amusing that we're 50 pages into this thread and still no release date. I'm sure this bodes very well for the next album This thread will be locked before that DVD is ever officially released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NGOG Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 That type of mentality rings of Team Brazil apologism. At the end of the day, Rock Fuel have already released multiple DVDs. One of those DVDs featured a performance by The Smashing Pumpkins (who themselves have endured changing line-ups).There is a basic protocol when it comes to due royalties; why are GNR the only entity that seemingly 'suffer' from it?Are they trying to prevent Slash and Duff from claiming royalties?I never claimed that.Nor have I claimed Fernando is "to blame". I heard he was perceived as being unsupportive by Rock Fuel.You have an incredibly annoying habit of saying "i never said that" when someone asks you a follow-up question to something you said. If you want to talk like a pseudo-insider than just answer the inevitable follow-up q's when you say something. You will come off half as douchey.No, I have an incredibly justified habit of taking exception to false accusations.I merely questioned the validity of placing responsibility with Rock Fuel. I did so because a member of Rock Fuel explicitly stated that Fernando was being "unsupportive". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bards Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 (edited) No, I have an incredibly justified habit of taking exception to false accusations.But no one's accusing anything. They're asking follow-up questions. When you give vague, half-ass statements it's natural to ask what you mean so people don't form the wrong opinion.My sincere apologies if english is not your first language, but you seem to have a real blind spot in communication here. Edited November 22, 2013 by Bards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NGOG Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 Follow-up questions on what? What did I say?That type of mentality rings of Team Brazil apologism. At the end of the day, Rock Fuel have already released multiple DVDs. One of those DVDs featured a performance by The Smashing Pumpkins (who themselves have endured changing line-ups).There is a basic protocol when it comes to due royalties; why are GNR the only entity that seemingly 'suffer' from it?I didn't claim to know anything; I'm asking questions myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coma16 Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 No, I have an incredibly justified habit of taking exception to false accusations.But no one's accusing anything. They're asking follow-up questions. When you give vague, half-ass statements it's natural to ask what you mean so people don't form the wrong opinion.My sincere apologies if english is not your first language, but you seem to have a real blind spot in communication here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bards Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 Follow-up questions on what? What did I say?That type of mentality rings of Team Brazil apologism. At the end of the day, Rock Fuel have already released multiple DVDs. One of those DVDs featured a performance by The Smashing Pumpkins (who themselves have endured changing line-ups).There is a basic protocol when it comes to due royalties; why are GNR the only entity that seemingly 'suffer' from it?I didn't claim to know anything; I'm asking questions myself.You're the one with the supposed "in" at Rock Fuel. Dude asked a question if Slash/Duff were part of the hold-up and you get right on your high horse about "never claiming that" and jumping into "false accusations". It's a question. If you know the answer and the answer is no, just say that. If you don't know, say that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wfuckinga Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 Either answer it or STFU 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussTCB Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 That type of mentality rings of Team Brazil apologism. At the end of the day, Rock Fuel have already released multiple DVDs. One of those DVDs featured a performance by The Smashing Pumpkins (who themselves have endured changing line-ups).There is a basic protocol when it comes to due royalties; why are GNR the only entity that seemingly 'suffer' from it?Are they trying to prevent Slash and Duff from claiming royalties?I never claimed that.Nor have I claimed Fernando is "to blame". I heard he was perceived as being unsupportive by Rock Fuel.You have an incredibly annoying habit of saying "i never said that" when someone asks you a follow-up question to something you said. If you want to talk like a pseudo-insider than just answer the inevitable follow-up q's when you say something. You will come off half as douchey.No, I have an incredibly justified habit of taking exception to false accusations.I merely questioned the validity of placing responsibility with Rock Fuel. I did so because a member of Rock Fuel explicitly stated that Fernando was being "unsupportive".NGOG answered the original question quite clearly here ^To me knowledge, no one on this site has made any claims about Slash & Duff holding anything up. The only claim that I know of, which I heard from a source myself is the one NGOG stated above; that Fernando is the one they're (Rock Fuel) having a hard time with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axl_morris Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 Should the forum PM fernando? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coma16 Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 Should the forum PM fernando?Lol good one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post magisme Posted November 22, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted November 22, 2013 I asked my source about this and he said, "GNR is still together?" so I have nothing. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts