Jump to content

Did Axl's voice peak in 93-94?


Recommended Posts

Needless to say, he sounded the best ever in '86-88. But he seemed to have far more control over his voice from UYI onwards.

I think Axl sounds fantastic on TSI and Sympathy for the Devil. This might not be the most popular opinion, but I love his singing on Aint it Fun and Sympathy for the Devil. He lost his rasp on Live Era, but his voice seems very much intact during 93 and 94.

That said, there's this unfortunate live performance from early 1994 w/ Springsteen which makes his voice sound like it's been wrecked from the years of touring UYI:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RONIN said:

Needless to say, he sounded the best ever in '86-88. But he seemed to have far more control over his voice from UYI onwards.

I think Axl sounds fantastic on TSI and Sympathy for the Devil. This might not be the most popular opinion, but I love his singing on Aint it Fun and Sympathy for the Devil. He lost his rasp on Live Era, but his voice seems very much intact during 93 and 94.

That said, there's this unfortunate live performance from early 1994 w/ Springsteen which makes his voice sound like it's been wrecked from the years of touring UYI:

 

I agree. I don't think his voice has ever sounded any better on wax than on Sympathy and Spaghetti though I do think his current run with DC is right up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nah, in fact, even on the Skin and Bones tour his voice gets thinner and thinner... I'd say that the end of 93 and 94 when his voice started to turn in to an early version of Mickey

That being said, he even got some rasp back in 98-99 but slowly started to turn into full Mickey (like Axl recently said: he wanted to sing on a new voice to prevent more damage to his voice)

 

After that , what've heard on 2011 onwards till the reunion gigs, he just lost the overall power to his voice. That's the main factor, imho. In 2001-02 he was full mickey but got some great power while at it. 

 

let's hope that with his current vocal coach, he could accomplish a great voice in the GNR gigs too!

Edited by Strange Broue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunno, no sod heard from him for the years after so it's difficult to tell.  I dont consider the Springleton performance and indication of a shot voice though, he's just singing in a particular way for the song.

Edited by Len B'stard
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always preferred the unhinhed high wail he had during his early days. Pre-Appetite. But I fully understand it is not to everyone's liking. He was probably a much better singer in 1993. And he is probably a technically better singer now in 2016, only too bad his voice has deteriorated and is not as versatile and strong in all registers as back in the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Axl's stint with ac/dc has given me a new found respect for the CD vocals. I do not like that ac/dc style of singing, where he's screaming throughout a song, and if that's what people mean when they complain about a lack of rasp, then count me out.

The problem of late, is that he needs to find a nicer tone to go with the cleaner vocals. Singing clean in of itself, isn't the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever he did to make his voice "clearer" did damage to his raspy falsetto and created Mickey. 

As far as 93-94 goes his voice was well trained and the vocal muscles were as strong and controlled as they will ever be. 

Now what he did after 94 was what did the most damage. He stopped exercising his vocal chords and they deteriorated so when he came back to singing a couple years later his voice was shot. He tried to recreate it using a ton of rasp to cover up the weaker vocals coming out and around 98 we got that new version of Sweet Child that was definitely not the voice of well maintained vocal chords, I think after that didn't get a good reception he tried to create a "clearer" voice in line with a Robert Plant but again the vocal chords were not strong enough to create an appealing voice. He was left without his most important tool and I think it scared him, the CD era guys talk about Axl never singing with them, the first time they heard him was on tapes sent down to the recording studio. So I think Axl knew something was wrong, and he's tried to cover it in a variety of ways. He got it going with some great vocal work in 06 though, so I believe that to be the case of strengthening up the vocal muscles again using excercises and consistent singing.

 

all just theory of course. I'd love to hear Axl go into more detail with some honesty...I think he's afraid to admit he ever lost his voice 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RONIN said:

Needless to say, he sounded the best ever in '86-88. But he seemed to have far more control over his voice from UYI onwards.

I think Axl sounds fantastic on TSI and Sympathy for the Devil. This might not be the most popular opinion, but I love his singing on Aint it Fun and Sympathy for the Devil. He lost his rasp on Live Era, but his voice seems very much intact during 93 and 94.

That said, there's this unfortunate live performance from early 1994 w/ Springsteen which makes his voice sound like it's been wrecked from the years of touring UYI:

 

In the above video his voice sounds very restrained to me. Possibly a stylistic choice or might not have been. You also have to take into consideration that, according to the lore, neither Bruce Springsteen nor Axl were planning on performing here. They were a last minute stand in when Rod Stewart couldn't make it. They had no rehearsal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me the "skin n' bones" axl is by far the very best voice.  I never get tired of hearing those shows.  And in fact thats the voice of tsi and sftd.  Axl voice on those is ridiculously magic, wonderfull, powerfull, and with that "tender/soft" axl touch when needed.

 

For me not only axl,  the entire band was on their peak.  For example Slash, back then, was playing sweet child long solo while walking and looking at the audience. Duff started to do some nice well thoght stuff on bass,  and sorum... Ohh sorum.  Sorum on skin and bones leg, tsi and sftd ??  g-sus,  FREAKINSLY MEGA-WONDERFULL. 

 

Back to original subject..   Axl 93-94. Will never be heard again.  ( wich makes me think what the hell happened between 95 and 1999 with his voice?  I still dont get it. But if i have to bet, i'll say he waned to change his sound and 1-he had some surgery for that. Or. 2- he tried so hard to clean his voice that he broke/crack something there)

But if axl keeps singing like he have been on 2016, we may have THE SECOND BEST AXL OF ALL TIME

 

ROCK ON!!!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, SEPTEM said:

For me the "skin n' bones" axl is by far the very best voice.  I never get tired of hearing those shows.  And in fact thats the voice of tsi and sftd.  Axl voice on those is ridiculously magic, wonderfull, powerfull, and with that "tender/soft" axl touch when needed.

 

For me not only axl,  the entire band was on their peak.  For example Slash, back then, was playing sweet child long solo while walking and looking at the audience. Duff started to do some nice well thoght stuff on bass,  and sorum... Ohh sorum.  Sorum on skin and bones leg, tsi and sftd ??  g-sus,  FREAKINSLY MEGA-WONDERFULL. 

 

Back to original subject..   Axl 93-94. Will never be heard again.  ( wich makes me think what the hell happened between 95 and 1999 with his voice?  I still dont get it. But if i have to bet, i'll say he waned to change his sound and 1-he had some surgery for that. Or. 2- he tried so hard to clean his voice that he broke/crack something there)

But if axl keeps singing like he have been on 2016, we may have THE SECOND BEST AXL OF ALL TIME

 

ROCK ON!!!

Exactly this!

But the second best Vocal era was 2006 IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nevergotochurch said:

question about the live era album: the songs span several years on that album... and I'm wondering if the vocals are actually Axl's live vocals or were they all re-recorded in a studio around the time of the release.

They are re-recorded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SEPTEM said:

For me the "skin n' bones" axl is by far the very best voice.  I never get tired of hearing those shows.  And in fact thats the voice of tsi and sftd.  Axl voice on those is ridiculously magic, wonderfull, powerfull, and with that "tender/soft" axl touch when needed.

 

For me not only axl,  the entire band was on their peak.  For example Slash, back then, was playing sweet child long solo while walking and looking at the audience. Duff started to do some nice well thoght stuff on bass,  and sorum... Ohh sorum.  Sorum on skin and bones leg, tsi and sftd ??  g-sus,  FREAKINSLY MEGA-WONDERFULL. 

 

Back to original subject..   Axl 93-94. Will never be heard again.  ( wich makes me think what the hell happened between 95 and 1999 with his voice?  I still dont get it. But if i have to bet, i'll say he waned to change his sound and 1-he had some surgery for that. Or. 2- he tried so hard to clean his voice that he broke/crack something there)

But if axl keeps singing like he have been on 2016, we may have THE SECOND BEST AXL OF ALL TIME

 

ROCK ON!!!

Sorum really shines on TSI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly prefer his 2010 voice to '93. His voice had thinned a lot by the end of the UYI tour, still great of course but I've always liked '91 the best, 2010 was the closest to his 91/92 voice IMO, back to the deeper rasp. '88-91 was probably his peak but 2010 and 2006 were great, and I can't wait to hear him in August because he's sounding great this year too, these videos are from today:

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He gave his all (110%) when he cared (pre break up).   He kicked ass in Vegas (undortuantely he's 54) but he'll never sound like he did back when they were a band.  So sad (the wasted years '94-April 2016).   Depressing if ya think what coulda been. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/12/2016 at 1:50 AM, RONIN said:

Needless to say, he sounded the best ever in '86-88. But he seemed to have far more control over his voice from UYI onwards.

I think Axl sounds fantastic on TSI and Sympathy for the Devil. This might not be the most popular opinion, but I love his singing on Aint it Fun and Sympathy for the Devil. He lost his rasp on Live Era, but his voice seems very much intact during 93 and 94.

That said, there's this unfortunate live performance from early 1994 w/ Springsteen which makes his voice sound like it's been wrecked from the years of touring UYI:

 

That performance doesnt count. It was a random performance. He didnt even warm up. They thought of the song to play while sitting at the table watching the rest of the show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...