Jump to content

The Spotify X-Files thread


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Blackstar said:

Maybe. It doesn't seem to work with other letters after "ro" though, like "roff",  "rojj"etc. (except for "s", of course

I agree the inconsistency is weird but I'd say it's more likely to do with something like that than anything else. For instance in songs if I search that songs labeled "Robbery" come up, confusing the V's for B's.

Edited by AxlRoseCDII
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Blackstar said:

I didn't get it either, but @avahlandjust explained it above. There's a (popular, I suppose) artist called Rovv who has a (popular) song called Seven. I guess what is implied here is that it brings up GN'R because they also have a song called Seven in the system.

Well that's a clever way of looking at it. That's a new Spotify X File. 

I wonder if searching for Taylor Swift brings up GNR now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, metalavenger99 said:

lol man wtf that site is exactly called like that:rofl-lol: I wonder if it's that old 🤣

According to web.archive.org, it exists at least since 1998. So Buckethead was inspired by an "adult" site and Axl decided to make a song out of it? :lol:

1 minute ago, metalavenger99 said:

I wonder if searching for Taylor Swift brings up GNR now.

It doesn't.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Blackstar said:

According to web.archive.org, it exists at least since 1998. So Buckethead was inspired by an "adult" site and Axl decided to make a song out of it? :lol:

I can't remember where I read this, but didn't Buckethead used to drive to the studio with a doll like that in his passenger seat? Now it makes sense after 23 years. :lol::bucket: (I mean now we know where he bought that)

Edited by metalavenger99
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, StrangerInThisTown said:

I don't ever see us getting a definite explanation for this unless someone here starts working at Spotify or knows someone who does. All we have is several different theories that can not be proven.

Imo if the sound check song is Oklahoma then some release is definitely planned. And the song titles on Spotify should give us an idea on what a release could be in return

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Blackstar said:

Why does it also bring up AC/DC for you, though?

 

46 minutes ago, AxlRoseCDII said:

Search "ro" and GNR comes up down the artist list. When you add letters that the system doesn't know what to do with it likely is just trying to find any match they can.

I just think it's because both ACDC and GNR have"rock" tagged as genre

Edited by metalavenger99
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, metalavenger99 said:

 

I just think it's because both ACDC and GNR have"rock" tagged as genre

For me, when I type "rovv" the only rock band it brings up is GN'R. When I type "rov", though, AC/DC, Nirvana and some other rock artists come up as well as GN'R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One last thing about real doll.com, I found where I learned the Buckethead thing, it came from an interview at Apetite for Distortion.(Journalist Art Tavana, I think he wrote a gnr book)

he (Buckethead) would have a dummy or a mannequin of a girl, and her throat was slit, and there was blood all over the girl’s body, and he would just put the seatbelt on her and drive around with her and use the carpool lane.” 

I doubt that song will ever get released and I doubt it has vocals, but I'm 100% sure the song, the site, and the story are all connected, the locker leaks were amazing... 22 years after that shit happened you can now "figure this out"

  • GNFNR 1
  • Wow 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s hard to watch this thread. They should call the next album, Use Your Delusion.  I want a new album so bad from these guys but it ain’t happening. We’ve gotten to the point where we’re grasping for straws. It’s also a little disheartening the TWO ‘new’ songs since 2008 were ones hardcore fans already heard. It’s like punishment for the leaks but also makes me feel “do they really have much else left?”. . 
 

i like Hard School and actually really like Absurd (the original 2000 version even more) but the fact they chose these 2 as the first big new music singles leaves me to believe they don’t have much left in the tank. Because I never understood this “oh they’re saving the big guns”.  It’s just a weird mentality, like, “hey these songs are OK but don’t worry! They’re not our best ones!”  Like way to strive for the best 

Edited by BillConnor_1982
  • GNFNR 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Blackstar said:

Why does it also bring up AC/DC for you, though?

It thinks the search is a typo for “rock.” Same reason the rock playlist pops up. 
 

If I search it on my account it brings up the artist Rovv, and then a ton of artist I listen to who have their genres tagged as “rock.” 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, metalavenger99 said:

One last thing about real doll.com, I found where I learned the Buckethead thing, it came from an interview at Apetite for Distortion.(Journalist Art Tavana, I think he wrote a gnr book)

he (Buckethead) would have a dummy or a mannequin of a girl, and her throat was slit, and there was blood all over the girl’s body, and he would just put the seatbelt on her and drive around with her and use the carpool lane.” 

I doubt that song will ever get released and I doubt it has vocals, but I'm 100% sure the song, the site, and the story are all connected, the locker leaks were amazing... 22 years after that shit happened you can now "figure this out"

Thank God he's out of GNR. What the heck was Axl thinking bring this guy into GNR???

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Draguns said:

Thank God he's out of GNR. What the heck was Axl thinking bring this guy into GNR???

That the dude was unreal at playing guitar and writing guitar parts. Considering that at the time Axl also had this vision about the band's sound changing and he didn't think some of Robin's solo contributions were good enough, it made a lot of sense to bring in someone who could do the things Buckethead could do.

Edited by Axl S
  • GNFNR 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chrismcquillan said:

Spoke to a musician I know who publishes on Spotify.

He says it'll be nothing to do with an algorithm. The record company will 100% have uploaded these tracks to licensing databases that power Spotify and other services for two reasons.

1) It allows copyright takedowns to occur instantly if anyone uploads leaks to services like YouTube.

2) It prevents other people publishing tracks with the same titles and artist data, obviously.

So he thinks the tracks are definitely in the system. Whether it's indicative of a release or not, he couldn't say.

It's possible there's a release coming, or there are concerns about the finished tracks leaking, so it's a preventative measure to stop them getting onto services like YT.

May well be, but there are loads of tracks with the same title - it's inevitable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, chrismcquillan said:

Title & meta data combo, so title, length, artist name etc.

Doesn't block any musician from uploading a song called "Oh My God" for example.

But isn't that what copyright is for? E.g. no one else can upload a song on Spotify under the name of Guns N' Roses? Why would they need to preempt that with metadata? Just asking, I don't know jack about this. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, chrismcquillan said:

Title & meta data combo, so title, length, artist name etc.

Doesn't block any musician from uploading a song called "Oh My God" for example.

How is that in any way connected? No one can upload a song with artist name Guns N Roses lol, the meta data has nothing to do with that, because you have to upload it from the GNR account to publish it as GNR songs. This explanation makes no sense to me.

And secondly, not sure how someone who uploads his music on Spotify is in any way knowledgeable or qualified to comment on this anyway lol, not like they are being "briefed" on any of the inner workings like an employee, they just put their songs there and then people can stream it.

Edited by StrangerInThisTown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jamillos said:

But isn't that what copyright is for? E.g. no one else can upload a song on Spotify under the name of Guns N' Roses? Why would they need to preempt that with metadata? Just asking, I don't know jack about this. 

Think of it this way.

Spotify allows musicians to upload their music, and that music is cross referenced and checked with the licensing databases etc.

That's fine.

Now think of YouTube, where anyone could upload a video under any name. You see "Copyright claim by Universal Music LLC or something" as soon as you upload that, because the track itself is identified in the database immediately.

I'd assume having to upload files with titles to the database stops musicians from just copyrighting any random audio segment they want, but it's frequently done for copyright control. You can upload music and then set a publish date of 100 years in the future. But if that file did get out online at any point, even if the artist didn't intend to release it, they can have it pulled down or at least monetise it.

These licensing databases power a lot more than Spotify. They power TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, all sorts.

And there's plenty of music submission sites that allow artists to submit onto these databases.

More pertinent question would be, why would you not upload the tracks if they're finished? Even if you don't want to release them yet.

  • GNFNR 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chrismcquillan said:

Spoke to a musician I know who publishes on Spotify.

He says it'll be nothing to do with an algorithm. The record company will 100% have uploaded these tracks to licensing databases that power Spotify and other services for two reasons.

1) It allows copyright takedowns to occur instantly if anyone uploads leaks to services like YouTube.

2) It prevents other people publishing tracks with the same titles and artist data, obviously.

So he thinks the tracks are definitely in the system. Whether it's indicative of a release or not, he couldn't say.

It's possible there's a release coming, or there are concerns about the finished tracks leaking, so it's a preventative measure to stop them getting onto services like YT.

This person does not have any more knowledge than the rest of us when it comes to how Spotify works in the back end. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...