Jump to content

Axl has his own Website now


Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, AxlIsGod. said:

He was probably wise to never release it at any time tbh, sometimes it's better to just not talk.

In other news, this site probably means nothing new. Maybe just some initiative over at LN to get personal sites for big name stars? Who knows, it certainly looks AI-driven so far.

I'd say this is the most likely scenario. 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, GnR Chris said:

Well, I don't think this is anything other than securing a URL for potential use in the future. Like his official TikTok page. Or Instagram. Both of which he never uses.

You don't have to put a website on a URL to secure it.  You just need to register the domain name and keep paying to renew it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 2020_Intensions said:

Axl Rose is 62 years old. It's fucking insane reading ya'll say shit like "years later" in regards to when GnR will get around to new music .... It's like there's no self awareness that this dude is 62 years old and has had a declining vocal capability for years now ... I swear some of you don't recognize the fact that this isn't 40 year old Axl from 2002 anymore ...

Please stop mentioning Axl's age, or at least minimize the number of references.  Seeing his age pointed out makes me feel old even though I'm 14 years younger than he is.

To your point, I think there is a higher likelihood of peace in the middle east than GNR releasing truly new music ever again.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/17/2024 at 7:42 PM, StrangerInThisTown said:

This seems really out of time, it's strange to launch your own website in 2024 when you would have the biggest, and fastest reach possible just using Instagram. Will be interesting to see what this is used for

Absolutely nothing. 

This will not mean Axl is going solo. dream on people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, JimiRose said:

Absolutely nothing. 

This will not mean Axl is going solo. dream on people. 

Someones gotta be paying for this shit, so it's gotta be used for something. No one pays bills and website designers just to do jack shit with it.

There's gotta be an idea behind it when he just doesn't do what everyone else does these days, which is just to use your Instagram. Solo album seems far fetched I agree, and a book is kind of doubtful aswell. So I'm still interested to see what the reason for it to exist is.

Edited by StrangerInThisTown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gavgnr said:

Please clarify 

I have a few times. In short:

According to the liner notes of the recent singles, GN'R owns the rights to the recordings, which means that GN'R, and not the label, paid for the re-recording and production. Which, in turn, may also mean that Axl has bought the rights to the original masters from the label.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 2020_Intensions said:

Axl Rose is 62 years old. It's fucking insane reading ya'll say shit like "years later" in regards to when GnR will get around to new music .... It's like there's no self awareness that this dude is 62 years old and has had a declining vocal capability for years now ... I swear some of you don't recognize the fact that this isn't 40 year old Axl from 2002 anymore ...

Exactly. Anybody that thinks otherwise has their head up their arse. 

He could still hypothetically release plenty of music, but it would take an incredible shift in his thinking, workflow and creative process.

Anyway, you're spot on with all of the above. 

*See serial confused face user below to find the no 1 head up their arse commenter😉

Edited by Tom2112
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 2020_Intensions said:

Axl Rose is 62 years old. It's fucking insane reading ya'll say shit like "years later" in regards to when GnR will get around to new music .... It's like there's no self awareness that this dude is 62 years old and has had a declining vocal capability for years now ... I swear some of you don't recognize the fact that this isn't 40 year old Axl from 2002 anymore ...

I totally understand the concept of age and declining abilities due to said aging.

What I don't understand is how someone who sounds like a 90 year old woman who's out of breath, singing these classics & still charging $200+ a ticket.

I spent $600 on 2 tickets in 2016. I was fine with that, too. A year later he sounded bad and it's only gotten worse since.

Anyone who listens to the proshots of Paradise City/Sweet Child with Underwood or November Rain from Presley's funeral & thinks that sounds good, I have questions about their hearing abilities.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tom2112 said:

Exactly. Anybody that thinks otherwise has their head up their arse. 

He could still hypothetically release plenty of music, but it would take an incredible shift in his thinking, workflow and creative process.

Anyway, you're spot on with all of the above. 

Ok this might derail the thread but I gotta get into this: Yes he is right about the creativity aspect, but he's forgetting one major thing, that just started existing within this last year: which is the advancement in AI technology which also influences the "studio magic" that is possible.

With the advancements of AI technology in just this year alone (it's in it's infancy), Axl can pretty much record and sound like he did on Appetite, aslong as he can still hit the notes (which he can, albeit in his clean tone). He didn't lose his range, he just lost the rasp which is really demanding vocally, and of course you can't keep up that singing style for 30+ years. This is the reason why people like Mick Jagger and Steven Tyler still sound so good, they sang more with their natural tone.

But now in a studio setting, he can record with the clean vocals and apply an AI created Axl voice filter on it, which works kind of like a guitar effect pedal (but just on his recorded voice instead) and have him sound like his 1987 self with the rasp completely added onto the vocals by the AI which works by feeding it with soundclips of his isolated studio vocals from AFD/UYI. People are already doing this with other singers, just applying an AI Axl onto the voice and it sometimes already sounds dead on, so when he does it with his own vocals, it'll sound pretty much perfect.

So GNR can release as much music as they want, aslong as Axl actually starts working on it.

Edited by StrangerInThisTown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, I don’t think it’s really crazy or far fetched for any fan to think a book might be in the fold.. 

Since 2016 (maybe even further back),  his character has been scrutinized WAY less by the press/media. I’d even say there hasn’t really been ANYTHING negative about Axl as a person in the news in years (other than the SA lawsuit). 

On top of AXL/DC + 7 years of Stadium tours with Slash and Duff, I’d imagine this would be the perfect time to put out a book. 

Of course nobody knows and we shouldn’t get our hopes up- but I wouldn’t be surprised by any means if he ever put a book out 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, VeeR said:

I've seen a few people getting stuck on this "quote" on the first few pages of this thread. If you load the website on a mobile device, it appears to me that it might be possibly a title to something, like a song or book. 

zmrzmBi.jpeg

Let’s be real.. that would be a good cover of an autobiography! (Minus the “drag me” part 😂)

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, StrangerInThisTown said:

 No one pays bills and website designers just to do jack shit with it.

Axl has literally spent hundreds of thousands doing this exact thing with domain names, urls, rights and done nothing with them. And of course most famously - music. It's just who he is. he has more money than our wildest dreams, he probably gets ideas, spends money on them and then just doesnt care or forgets. he's been doing that for about 28 years now

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StrangerInThisTown said:

Ok this might derail the thread but I gotta get into this: Yes he is right about the creativity aspect, but he's forgetting one major thing, that just started existing within this last year: which is the advancement in AI technology which also influences the "studio magic" that is possible.

With the advancements of AI technology in just this year alone (it's in it's infancy), Axl can pretty much record and sound like he did on Appetite, aslong as he can still hit the notes (which he can, albeit in his clean tone). He didn't lose his range, he just lost the rasp which is really demanding vocally, and of course you can't keep up that singing style for 30+ years. This is the reason why people like Mick Jagger and Steven Tyler still sound so good, they sang more with their natural tone.

But now in a studio setting, he can record with the clean vocals and apply an AI created Axl voice filter on it, which works kind of like a guitar effect pedal (but just on his recorded voice instead) and have him sound like his 1987 self with the rasp completely added onto the vocals by the AI which works by feeding it with soundclips of his isolated studio vocals from AFD/UYI. People are already doing this with other singers, just applying an AI Axl onto the voice and it sometimes already sounds dead on, so when he does it with his own vocals, it'll sound pretty much perfect.

So GNR can release as much music as they want, aslong as Axl actually starts working on it.

This is a fair and reasonable point, they could use the tech available today.

My argument against is that 1. I'm a purist and don't want to hear robot music. I'm ok with some autotune here and there but the idea of AI enhanced Axl makes me nauseous. I'll take current day Axls attempt for better or for worse. 2. If Axl uses that tech to sound like a younger voiced version of himself, he paints himself into a corner of not being able to perform it live. 3. I'd have to imagine Slash would be seriously against this, he is a pure traditional rock guy and barely likes using pro tools. 

This idea is fine for deceased musicians to finish off demos like the Beatles etc. but Axl is still alive and fit to work. I think the point of the post is the reality of Axls vocal ability and the reality of performing live and that it's not going to get any easier so now is the time to release music and tour while he still can pull it off. I don't think he's going to be able to do jungle etc. in another few years. 

On topic. I would love to read an Axl book. 

I would not like to be the editor though🤣

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/17/2024 at 3:32 PM, Rindmelon said:

No 'All things considered?' 

All things considered, if you consider all of the things that are up for consideration, I would consider all of the things to be considered until further notice. All things being considered, that is.

Not to be inconsiderate...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...